Forum
is this ava acceptable?
|
0632242545 wrote
at 3:29 AM, Wednesday October 19, 2011 EDT |
|
Gangstrrr wrote
at 1:59 PM, Wednesday October 19, 2011 EDT veta...you don't need yet another irrelevant non-issue to crusade and whine about... you need a new diaper
|
|
wishbone wrote
at 3:21 PM, Wednesday October 19, 2011 EDT GIVE ME A T!
|
|
|
wishbone wrote
at 3:21 PM, Wednesday October 19, 2011 EDT GIVE ME A Y!
|
|
|
wishbone wrote
at 3:21 PM, Wednesday October 19, 2011 EDT WHAT'S THAT SPELL? thrax?
|
|
Vermont wrote
at 3:32 PM, Wednesday October 19, 2011 EDT The Supreme Court itself has a pretty big grey area here.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_know_it_when_I_see_it |
|
|
0632242545 wrote
at 3:51 PM, Wednesday October 19, 2011 EDT isn't that only in reference to hardcore pornography? like the super-obscene kind or whatever?
|
|
|
Vermont wrote
at 4:00 PM, Wednesday October 19, 2011 EDT You can answer that yourself via the link already provided. ;)
And if it is difficult for the Supreme Court (justice) to come up with a specific definition for hard-core pornography, it's fairly simple to extrapolate that anything less extreme would be even more challenging. (as evidenced by this thread) |
|
|
0632242545 wrote
at 4:14 PM, Wednesday October 19, 2011 EDT well the link says this is in reference to hard-core pornography... as opposed to what i assume would be soft-core pornography. which is like what peter's avatar is.
|
|
|
0632242545 wrote
at 4:15 PM, Wednesday October 19, 2011 EDT |
|
|
wishbone wrote
at 4:52 PM, Wednesday October 19, 2011 EDT SOMEONE FIGURE OUT WHAT I WROTE
|
