Forum
gap is too big and im sad...(to ryan, please read)...
|
sarahxxx wrote
at 10:55 AM, Tuesday May 8, 2007 EDT
i have recently dropped below 2000 (and gutted) and the 1900 tables seem to come and go...cant there be permanent 1900 AND 2000 tables?
one loss at a 1700 table for me would mean me losing like a million points,,,i dont want that cos i know i can cut it at the top as i have done now for several weeks...i know other players are in similar positions...please sort it saz x |
|
alea iacta est wrote
at 10:36 AM, Friday May 11, 2007 EDT I like it like it is :D!
|
|
fuzzycat wrote
at 11:03 AM, Friday May 11, 2007 EDT alea iacta est, however you are aware its constantly changing by the mechanics themselves?
While months long 200 gaps were seperating to kidce community into slices, it are now 300 gaps. And it will only be a matter of time for 400 or 500, since the top players will always just play against themselves and propell them upward... |
|
StunnedFazer wrote
at 2:26 PM, Friday May 11, 2007 EDT Maybe a good compromise would be:
if there are 2000 tables, there should be at least one 1900 table |
|
Terence Hill wrote
at 3:03 PM, Friday May 11, 2007 EDT tja... nur die garten kommen in den Garten!
btw... Morgenstund hat Gold im Mund. ;o) |
|
|
Terence Hill wrote
at 3:04 PM, Friday May 11, 2007 EDT ... nur die harten kommen in den garten. ..
|
|
|
fuzzycat wrote
at 3:41 AM, Saturday May 12, 2007 EDT Aber die zweite Maus bekommt den Käse!
|
|
mike@in-russia wrote
at 7:29 AM, Saturday May 12, 2007 EDT Instability in 1900/2000 tables is very high. Sometimes they are swtching every next play
|
|
tsjombe wrote
at 8:50 AM, Saturday May 12, 2007 EDT the fast switching is indead annoying. Permanent 1900 tables seem me a good solution ?
|
|
kplayr wrote
at 5:48 PM, Saturday May 12, 2007 EDT Got to agree with Sarah but extend her idea further and have a series of permanent tables above 1500 say every 100 points so people can compete more fairly and the progression of skill is gradual. I played on the 1700's for a couple of weeks and dipped at 1699 then had to play with complete idiots with no strategy that meant illogical results and a furhter reduciton in my score due to their random and often insane gameplay. |
|
AleaIactaSunt wrote
at 11:27 AM, Sunday May 13, 2007 EDT Since we had this discussion months ago before, I can add: the gap-system (according to numbers of players) makes sense. I'm not gonna repeat the arguments all over again, but want to add those
"If I drop to the idiot-tables, I even loose more score, cause they all play insane" are rubbish. (1) Good players have to adapt. (2) Play DiceWars for training. (3) If you still cant become 1-3rd in 85% of the games down there, reconsider if you really are such a good player. to the 1700-2000 gap. It is a hard gap, because in my opinion, 1700 players are, if at all, only slightly worse players. But we now have ranks and not ratings anymore, so it doesnt really matter. If you play long enough, you will make it and on the way gain a better rank. |
