Forum
Dottir takes November TAZD.
|
skrumgaer wrote
at 9:57 AM, Thursday December 1, 2011 EST
The TAZD and baseball-style standings are explained on my Wall. At least 35 regular games played in the month are require to qualify for the monthly TAZD. Shown are Games Behind, TAZD, and player name.
GB TAZD Player 06 12178 dottir 13 11141 Emre Oguz 03 10171 masticore 00 9719 Invola 39 9539 Shevar 03 8878 OneShot7 18 8842 jona_vicente 06 8419 savif 22 8352 [Ocean]Flushed 32 8336 Mazaman 02 8224 toms 10 8170 what_up23 47 8155 jfdis 08 8113 @ata 24 8064 Az_Balu 17 7666 kostur 20 7604 L3xy 48 7603 bcmatteagles 16 7600 22-Apr 11 7427 Lady Lite 07 7406 Vollhonk 66 7294 Scabbard 26 7159 kdiceplaya! 22 6840 chaiNblade 29 6829 IFIGENIUS 17 6518 FPP 24 6504 _smile_ 69 6474 Remiel 43 6441 Simmo3k 40 6411 Mercantile 12 6397 xjxaxnx 11 6328 @Toomyfriends 93 6315 franklyghost 14 6259 Bu7Ch3r 34 6214 fish28 18 6129 Free Flags 19 6043 hcdug 24 5928 kudoukun 18 5921 ovbogaert 14 5907 peter luftig 36 5658 @engr2002 49 5588 EddyB 22 5474 @MikeTamburini 31 5398 Brighty 30 5333 fearlessflyer 39 5281 Lord Death 92 5210 Loobee 35 5123 Gurgi 66 5087 barmat 21 5065 joero14 66 5054 Jily 40 5044 hatty 33 4952 longpube 32 4921 NikkeKnatterton 29 4841 scarp8 54 4794 stackshotbilly 34 4784 OviloN 66 4733 Silesia 100 4730 axlehammer 45 4623 mrb2097 47 4600 nexon 21 4582 Volvic 23 4484 beatol 33 4471 Fatman_x 25 4411 KDancer 41 4306 xXxJozefxXx 25 4289 Keeley 26 4019 euphrates7 87 4003 Rsquared 36 3917 Poker Style 48 3808 "MC" 34 3760 haloducks 41 3641 bivo 69 3261 orestis85 52 3201 greekboi 73 3179 cool g 33 2960 MNK10 57 2817 Trkz 58 2784 greenman 65 2759 These tards suck 76 2714 GreGGwar 70 2500 absolutgimlet 61 2463 Johnboat 44 2285 Kingofskillz 84 2218 DonnieScribbles 93 2208 GR3ENMAN 73 2028 CCSKAOT 94 1253 Kdot 92 1248 ji-jo |
|
superxchloe wrote
at 3:55 PM, Thursday December 1, 2011 EST simple, skrum: the ASR (and ASR multiplier) and TAZD* account for outliers.
|
|
|
skrumgaer wrote
at 4:23 PM, Thursday December 1, 2011 EST So show me the TAZD*'s.
|
|
|
superxchloe wrote
at 5:50 PM, Thursday December 1, 2011 EST 10171 masticore
09539 Shevar 08842 jona_vicente 08419 savif 08344 dottir 08279 [Ocean]Flushed 08170 what_up23 08155 jfdis 08064 Az_Balu 07932 Mazaman 07909 Invola 07878 OneShot7 07840 toms 07666 kostur 07603 bcmatteagles 07519 22-Apr 07455 Emre Oguz 07427 Lady Lite 07294 Scabbard 07158 kdiceplaya! 06840 @ata 06839 chaiNblade 06503 _smile_ 06441 Simmo3k 06427 Remiel 06411 Mercantile 06315 franklyghost 06304 @Toomyfriends 06171 Bu7Ch3r 06129 Free Flags 06066 fish28 06043 hcdug 05928 kudoukun 05921 ovbogaert 05907 peter luftig 05775 FPP 05658 @engr2002 05556 xjxaxnx 05530 EddyB 05512 L3xy 05449 Vollhonk 05381 Brighty 05087 barmat 05053 Jily 05044 joero14 05035 fearlessflyer 04978 hatty 04952 longpube 04878 Lord Death 04862 Gurgi 04841 scarp8 04784 IFIGENIUS 04746 @MikeTamburini 04745 OviloN 04732 Silesia 04600 nexon 04595 mrb2097 04585 stackshotbilly 04484 beatol 04471 Fatman_x 04411 KDancer 04289 Keeley 04085 Volvic 04019 euphrates7 04003 Rsquared 03741 haloducks 03640 bivo 03535 xXxJozefxXx 03417 "MC" 03209 Poker Style 03201 greekboi 03006 axlehammer 02960 MNK10 02886 cool g 02817 Trkz 02770 greenman 02759 These tards suck 02714 GreGGwar 02639 orestis85 02450 absolutgimlet 02342 Johnboat 02285 Kingofskillz 02208 GR3ENMAN 02203 DonnieScribbles 02016 CCSKAOT 01253 Kdot 00873 ji-jo compensates for outliers in number of games (see dottir, Emre Oguz, l3xy, IFIGENIUS, axlehammer) as well as in percentage profiles (see ji-jo's notably lower score). |
|
|
superxchloe wrote
at 5:52 PM, Thursday December 1, 2011 EST oh- it's worth noting that dottir, axlehammer, and Emre Oguz are true outliers while l3xy and IFIGENIUS are mild outliers.
|
|
jona_vicente wrote
at 6:02 PM, Thursday December 1, 2011 EST fucking ah! im 3rd
|
|
|
skrumgaer wrote
at 6:16 PM, Thursday December 1, 2011 EST Compensating for outliers in number of games in the TAZD* leaves Vermont without an argument. Verm's argument only involves outliers in percentages.
|
|
Vermont wrote
at 6:28 PM, Thursday December 1, 2011 EST My argument that TAZD measures deviation and not skill is solid, and always has been. We've had this conversation before.
A skill ranking that recognizes positive vs negative deviation would be far more accurate as a test of skill. If all you want is a test of deviation, then you're all set. Chloe, doesn't one your scoring methods take into account pos/neg changes? You know, the crazy idea that someones score should go up as their first % goes up? |
|
|
Vermont wrote
at 6:29 PM, Thursday December 1, 2011 EST Are you actually arguing that because TAZD* fixes one issue, that the other one doesn't matter?
|
|
|
skrumgaer wrote
at 6:32 PM, Thursday December 1, 2011 EST No, I am saying that your assertion that the TAZD*'s fixing of one issue makes it "significantly superior" to the TAZD. You have the burden of proof to show this, using commonly accepted standards of significance.
|
|
|
Vermont wrote
at 6:37 PM, Thursday December 1, 2011 EST I said nothing about the TAZD* until after you made your recent statement, so I'm not sure why you're making that up.
I did mention chloe's asr, which I believe does take into account positive vs negative deviation. Several of us (myself, chloe, monte) have explained to you ad naseum in other threads as to why this is a superior method of measuring skill and not merely deviation. |
