Forum
Stop asking mods....
|
kdiceplaya! wrote
at 11:47 PM, Wednesday October 19, 2011 EDT
To be:
Perfect - they are human Perfectly consistent - not possible Like public officials - they are not paid and only spend limited time here Role models - no explanation required...this is a small website. We don't even expect multi-million dollar athletes or politicians to be role models. Able to make changes - Our absentee landlord is the only one that can To all you mods and a few others(Monte, das, etc): STOP CONSTANTLY ARGUING WITH TROLLS. Seriously, why are there so many 100+ threads that are mostly 4 or 5 people arguing with Veta? You should realize that is a waste of your time, you can never win. He's like the really annoying 5 year old brother that just keeps trying to annoy you. The more you react, the more he does it because he enjoys all the attention. Just ignore it. If you want to throw in a quick argument here and there, fine...but you wont get anywhere. To only the mods (mostly thrax and jurgen): Don't feel like if you don't respond to veta, that the community will think less of you. It's not like anyone here buys into the self absorbed ranting he does. If he says something like "crickets chirping, I win" or whatever....you don't have to respond. We will understand. Don't get sucked into all this. I know you guys don't like him and want to put him in his place, but that isn't possible. You have to look at it in a similar way to how one should look at a bully(not that veta is one, he is clearly not)...just remember that his interactions with you make your life slightly worse ONLY WHEN THAT INTERACTION TAKES PLACE. Remember that his life SUCKS ALL THE TIME. The bully has a shitty home life with divorced parents, his father beats him and puts cigarettes out on his eyelids, his entire life is loveless, etc...the only reason he acts like he does is because he is a product of such a shitty combination of life circumstances. Nothing you say is gonna phase him because he has been used to much worse for his entire life. To everyone: Just save yourself the trouble and ignore trolls. Ask yourself why you feel compelled to respond to complete bullshit. Save your breath for legitimate arguments and discussions posted by RESPECTED members of the community. Thanks you and I await all the "tl;dr" Bye-ee! |
|
0632242545 wrote
at 1:10 PM, Thursday October 20, 2011 EDT |
|
Thraxle wrote
at 1:14 PM, Thursday October 20, 2011 EDT You make no sense Veta.
Going back to the avatar conversation, I don't even know who Peter Whatshhisface is, but I'd consider GB a KDice friend. Why, then, do I think Peter's av is OK while GB's is offensive? In your analogy, GB is the hot chick (a friend) while Peter is the driver going 75 (random stranger). |
|
0632242545 wrote
at 1:23 PM, Thursday October 20, 2011 EDT Because I know in reality you put on a facade when you interact with kdicers, jurgen does the same thin - maybe he learned it from you. In reality I don't think you care much for GB, furthermore you werent the one that banned his avatar. You're only vicariously disapproving of it now that it's been done. Be honest, would you have banned his avatar if no other moderator did?
|
|
Thraxle wrote
at 1:29 PM, Thursday October 20, 2011 EDT Veta, stop thinking you know about me. I don't put on any fucking facades on KDice. Why would I? GB's av is by far the more raunchy, offensive avatar. I don't care who banned it. Your arrogance is unbelieveable at times.
Nobody here is doing anything sinister or underhanded. The fact that you think so only makes you look paranoid and childish. I can't admit to the things you want me to admit to because that simply isn't the way I see it. YOU are not always right, and you need to remember that. |
|
Thraxle wrote
at 1:31 PM, Thursday October 20, 2011 EDT To answer your question truthfully I probably wouldn't have banned Harry's av, I would have asked him to change it. Harry likely would have obliged and that would have ended it. If he didn't oblige, then I would have banned it.
Peter's av isn't offensive or pornographic in any way. |
|
0632242545 wrote
at 1:42 PM, Thursday October 20, 2011 EDT except for it being lewd and depicting nudity right?
|
|
boogybytes wrote
at 1:56 PM, Thursday October 20, 2011 EDT the only inconsistency in modding is that vetas newest alt has not been -post -chat -play
|
|
dasfury wrote
at 1:59 PM, Thursday October 20, 2011 EDT possibly the most valid argument against the mods (jurgen specifically) to date.
|
|
Vermont wrote
at 2:08 PM, Thursday October 20, 2011 EDT Veta, we had (I thought) a pretty reasonable conclusion to the whole av discussion. Can we leave it at that?
|
|
0632242545 wrote
at 2:09 PM, Thursday October 20, 2011 EDT I'm not the one who keeps bringing it up vermont.
|