Veta, you're wrong......that's the long and short of it.

How would an 8 year old know what he's looking at if he saw gb's avatar. seriously.

...Like someone would get away with posting an 'upright dick'.

You don't know many 8 year olds do you?

Veta, admit you're wrong and apologize for patronizing me. Anything less is unacceptable.

Shut your mouth Dick!

I have a feeling dddy likes peter's ava for more than just being a depiction of a mouse. And yes it is readily identifiable as a female body part.

You could show GB's ava to an 8 year old and they wouldnt know what to make of it. You show peter's and they will recognize it has a female body part. According to dddy's rule it seems pretty clear which one is pornographic no?

we should ask Honda or Boner what they think about peter's ava, as they made the ban on GB.

I'm willing to bet Amber considers it pornographic too.


Keep in mind pornography is supposed to turn you on, not gonna lie I think that titmouse of peter's belongs to a pretty nice pair and I'd question the sexuality of any man who disagrees. Stick figures on the other hand are stick figures.

And for the record I'm not saying one is worse than the other, in fact I don't care I just recognize that if one is bannable both are. If one is not, then neither are - according to the reasons given anyhow. moderators suddenly don't like to justify there bans so who knows right? it's like the fucking gestapo.

Why would an 8 year old know that's a titty but yet not know the two stick figures are fucking? Stop arguing....you lost.

I think we should stop justifying things because of whiny adolescents like yourself. Most sites don't have a "bitch about the mods" forum. You get banned, end of story.

God you whine a lot.

Again, as defined by Webster it's "the depiction of erotic behavior".

One av depicted erotic behavior, the other does not. The fact that you disagree with this is ridiculous.