Forum
New chat/post rule up for debate
|
Thraxle wrote
at 10:27 PM, Sunday October 16, 2011 EDT
Any mention of any medical disease/condition coupled with the mention of death or disability in any form within the same coherent thought/message should now be bannable with a minimum 3 day -chat/-post imposed.
All in favor say aye. All opposed say nay. |
|
Travis O Johnson wrote
at 11:01 PM, Sunday October 16, 2011 EDT why three days???
thats too long |
|
Thraxle wrote
at 11:05 PM, Sunday October 16, 2011 EDT Three days offends you Travis?
My sincere apologies...I meant no malice. |
|
0632242545 wrote
at 1:45 AM, Monday October 17, 2011 EDT So its okay to back track and go against your "thick skin" and ban when someone else is offended? Am I hearing that right rob? Well I guess you proved my point for me.
|
|
boogybytes wrote
at 1:55 AM, Monday October 17, 2011 EDT wait so if I state: "My medical condition is considered a disability" I get banned? wut???
|
|
jurgen wrote
at 1:59 AM, Monday October 17, 2011 EDT aye, only I would go for a standard 1 day first ban length (3 days being for very hatefull stuff or things that go on for more than 2-3 comments).
minimum required proof would still have to be a screencap OK, so from now on you better not use "omfg are you blind?" when someone attacks you when you weakflagged. |
|
axlehammer wrote
at 6:15 AM, Monday October 17, 2011 EDT nay because if sumone asks about a family member then it could ban telling about a serious condition..however any sarcastic remarks about such things should be banned.
|
|
KDICEMOD wrote
at 7:05 AM, Monday October 17, 2011 EDT God I love that guy's name. That should be my mod accounts name...
|
|
jurgen wrote
at 7:07 AM, Monday October 17, 2011 EDT good name, good avs, membership...let's just confiscate the account
|
|
Cal Ripken wrote
at 7:10 AM, Monday October 17, 2011 EDT fuck no.
|
|
KDICEMOD wrote
at 7:12 AM, Monday October 17, 2011 EDT Man, the site's sarcasm meter is waaaayyy off these days. This was a simple troll test on veta (that worked). But thanks for all the nays guys. Much appreciated.
|