mr K nailed it pretty well.

All the haters are butthurt from my non-stop trolling before Bis... it's all good, h8rs gon h8.

there is nothing wrong with trucing a friend over someone who isnt a friend.

everyone should be looked at as nontrustworthy until proven trustworthy

isnt a friend = unknown player

there's something inherently wrong with that gurgi, if you don't see it, you're missing what it is to be fair

99% of the time i truce a player that has given me no reason to trust him through his playstyle, he isnt worth trusting

LOL Gurgi, that is a big time exaggeration (99%). If they are able to post coherent thoughts in the chat box then they are usually able to be truced. It's the silent types that are hard to trust since they tend to do stupid shit.

I think the one grey area here that may deserve special mention is the silent truce. I'm way way way more likely to try and silent truce someone who is a long time player since they "get it" and at least 80% of the time they will see what you're doing. When you try to silent truce/move away from a random new player... about 80% of the time they will take your lands and move you from a 1-2 position to a 3-5ish fight.

I feel like it's not only fair but it's the smartest thing to do to win.

I'm not saying to gang up on the player but if given the choice I never truce people that don't give me a reason for me to think they are reliable.

silent truces are great with people who "Get it"

but even asking a player "truce?"

there is a chance that they will just let you die for a better position

(probably not 99% but enough)

you can usually just straight out tell a player who doesnt "get it"

'yo dude we silent truced earlier so halp'

but if the player sucks at truces he won't care

"I feel like it's not only fair but it's the smartest thing to do to win."

Trucing a friend over someone else is fair? that's what i'm reading here?

OH, and there's a 2nd benefit of winning? WOAH why haven't I been playing this style!