Man, if you guys would keep your responses to under 800 words I might respond, or care to read the whole thing.

"Obama is less transparent then Bush. Bush was less transparent then his predecessors; and so on and so on. The trend is going the wrong way and it also is in parallel to the growth of government. "

prove it, you make a claim but you don't cite any evidence or sources. prove his government is less transparent, in a general sense, than say bush's was. if you cant then quit making assertions without evidence, i'm happy to accept that assertion if you can prove it though.


whether or not you would prefer to be a girl or a guy is different because you have perspective on this question. i know nothing about horses let alone the specific geographical variations therein.

would u rather b a guy or a girl & why?

Obama transparency; I even found a liberal website complaining about Obama's so called transparency.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/03/16/obamas-broken-promise-fed_n_500526.html

Obama has almost double the amount of denied freedom of information requests the Bush.

That is just one way he is less transparent then Bush (not that Bush was transparent); but it is one of the most important things. There are several others; just google "obama transparent".

As far as the question about being a boy or a girl. You have to accept; that I dont know the answer to the question. Geez; I wish you were as tough on your liberal worldview as you are on me about this retarded boy or girl question. You have asked me 3 times in 2 separate threads as well as once or twice in the chat room of a game. Seriously I don't have an opinion either way. It is a silly question and I'm just refusing to waste my time thinking of an answer that will inevitably be based on bullshit.

it says theyre not MORE transparent. it doesnt say they're less transparent. cant u read dawg?

Read it again slowly. If you can't read plain english then I can't help you. I'm done here.

umadbro?

Nope just frustrated that you keep misreading sources.

You claim the source I just posted is about how transparent Obama is; when it clearly is the opposite.

The title of the article is "
Obama's Broken Promise: Federal Agencies Not More Transparent Under Obama Administration".

I mean seriously; I know you are probably just trolling; but what is the point of arguing with you if you aren't going to even going to read the sources.

i read dat shit dead mayb u need to reread it.

Well then we will have to agree to disagree. Anyone who cares to read the article can just make their own judgment.

So again you're defending Obama as being no worse than Bush even though you despised Bush and almost everything he did. That's a high standard you're setting for Barry.