Since you guys like numbers check out the size of the one for cost of improved random number generator.

It's not *that* hard to record thirty 4v3's and now it's almost a year and no one has posted an attempt at evidence yet.

What do you suggest JKD? Should I just copy paste? Screen shots?

i agree with valis. the rolls are out of hand. i lose way too many 6v3, 7v4, 5v3 etc.

About 10 games played tonight


Valis's turn
UA_175 defended 6v3: 15 to 17 (1,2,4,1,3,4 to 6,6,5)

You remember the losses more than you do the wins.

Exactly, that's why you think you're losing them way more than you do. It's all psychology, really. The more emotive event happens, the better you remember it. Do you get emotional over 6v4 wins? I don't think so. But you get seriously pissed off if that 6v4 loss loses you a game.

these new dice are stacked against the attacker, whether or not it has been made this way deliberately or its because of some system bug is yet to be decided

A random number generator is easy enough to make and easy enough to program. Going on about the cost of a random number generator only shows your ignorance in the world of programming.

If you have a 1.5 out of 10000 chance of losing a roll, you have the exact same chance of losing an identical roll - you think just because heads came up 99 times out of a hundred then then next flip -statistically speaking - is gonna be heads - no it dont work like that

Problem is that rolls are too random meaning completely random. Rolls should not be completely random.

For example: It rolls were not completely random but attacker or defender would get small bonus (increasing bonus) depending on how bug of an advanrage in number of dices (stack size) they have, then it would increase the strategical aspect of the game and decrease importance of luck.

It could go like this:

1. If stack is only 1, or 2 dices bigger (example 2v1 or 3v1) than attacker/defender (depending on are you attacking or defending) then no bonus.

2. If stack is 3 dices bigger then bonus of +1


3. If stack is 4 dices bigger then bonus of +2

4. If stack is 5 dices bigger then fixed/set bonus to roll +3

and so on...

(note: it is still possible to lose a roll)

5. If stack

(st

So in essense have fixed bonus added to roll that depends on advantage in number of dices on stack being used.

It could even go both ways meaning fixed bonus, fixed minus or perhapes even both. Just food for though.

edit button to posts would be nice too