Forum
gap is too big and im sad...(to ryan, please read)...
|
sarahxxx wrote
at 10:55 AM, Tuesday May 8, 2007 EDT
i have recently dropped below 2000 (and gutted) and the 1900 tables seem to come and go...cant there be permanent 1900 AND 2000 tables?
one loss at a 1700 table for me would mean me losing like a million points,,,i dont want that cos i know i can cut it at the top as i have done now for several weeks...i know other players are in similar positions...please sort it saz x |
|
Spartan300 wrote
at 5:03 AM, Thursday May 10, 2007 EDT A 4v2 loss in the beginning is cripling and skill has nothing to do with it.
|
|
sarahxxx wrote
at 5:09 AM, Thursday May 10, 2007 EDT but players know the 4v2 is not a dead cert and players must think, what if i lose it...at the end of the day 6v1 is almost impossible to lose but it can happen...and i agree, of course luck is heavily involved but chossing where to attack, or to attack at all is about making decisions...therefore strategy comes in2 the equation...u'll see that wen u hit 1900/2000 tables...such a different game!
|
|
Spartan300 wrote
at 5:21 AM, Thursday May 10, 2007 EDT Just face it, challenging someone to a game of kdice is silly because of the fortunes involved.
|
|
sarahxxx wrote
at 5:32 AM, Thursday May 10, 2007 EDT and ur point of the game bein based on luck is silly...and just for the record, i never actually said "come to the table and i will beat u at kdice"
i said "come find me on the tables, then we can sort this out...until then... " |
|
skrumgaer wrote
at 6:44 AM, Thursday May 10, 2007 EDT If I have a likelihood of winning I will usually issue a challenge "I will win unless you all start fighting me". If the challenge is taken up I lose more often than not. Hence the fewness of second place finishes in my profile.
|
|
rnd wrote
at 7:46 AM, Thursday May 10, 2007 EDT maybe the 250 person threshhold should be reconfigured to be a percentage of the active kdice population?
|
|
sminge wrote
at 7:51 AM, Thursday May 10, 2007 EDT i think that the tables should be 1500 1700 1900 2000 and 2100
the less players at the top, the harder it is and fall back down once u've made the 2000 milestone |
|
sminge wrote
at 7:52 AM, Thursday May 10, 2007 EDT and i agree with sarah, they should be permanent, not changing every so often as they seem to be doing now
|
|
aixo wrote
at 8:11 AM, Thursday May 10, 2007 EDT I like rnd´s idea to make the table-range with a percentage of the active kdice-population...
but then with a corridor like algios suggested! I don´t agree with these "permanent ranges" - no fun at all! |
|
sminge wrote
at 8:17 AM, Thursday May 10, 2007 EDT how wud it not be fun? i dont understand that
|