Forum
Advisor Blog
Reviews
Strategies
Ideas
Dottir takes 2011 yearly TAZD.
Posted By: skrumgaer at 6:09 PM, Wednesday January 4, 2012 EST
To qualify for the yearly TAZD competition, you must have played an average of 60 regular games per month, or to finish, 720 games.
The zero datum used was
07.2, 07.9, 10.2, 14.0, 17.5, 20.3, 22.9.
I have child-proofed the yearly TAZD, but I will not say in what way I have done it. The childproofing did not have to kick in in 2011.
***Special note: Actually the childproofing did kick in for Xar in the November standings, not because of any action of his, but by my compiling his January 2011 seventh place percentage as 14 instead of 14%. That happens if you don't include the final % sign when you capture the data with the mouse. Note that his final percentages added to 129%. Xar's corrected November standings should have been
0865 15% 19% 17% 14% 12% 11% 07% 13457 Xar
Here are the complete final standings:
7167 15% 16% 16% 16% 13% 11% 09% 28193 dottir
1036 24% 18% 20% 13% 09% 08% 06% 27003 grandgnu
5818 19% 13% 11% 11% 15% 14% 14% 21834 dirtyrolls
1648 21% 17% 16% 10% 11% 10% 13% 20963 1st.skyler
1641 21% 18% 12% 10% 09% 12% 16% 20017 kdiceplaya!
1743 20% 17% 13% 13% 13% 11% 10% 19795 Mercantile
0730 21% 21% 15% 13% 10% 10% 06% 18357 Mazaman
2596 17% 16% 16% 12% 11% 12% 13% 18217 Lady Lite
2124 18% 15% 16% 14% 12% 10% 11% 18050 stakaboo
0720 22% 18% 17% 12% 13% 08% 06% 18028 montecarlo
1632 20% 17% 10% 11% 11% 11% 17% 17769 chaiNblade
1217 17% 19% 16% 13% 14% 10% 08% 16780 DrunkDaShiVa
1472 20% 15% 15% 13% 14% 10% 11% 16732 Fonias
0732 15% 20% 20% 18% 12% 08% 04% 16708 SirPepa781
3504 16% 16% 12% 11% 12% 14% 15% 16239 Az_Balu
1497 19% 18% 09% 11% 15% 11% 14% 15976 Gurgi
2463 13% 16% 17% 13% 11% 12% 13% 13905 BAMMBI
1838 17% 15% 14% 16% 12% 12% 11% 13662 ehervey
0865 15% 19% 17% 14% 12% 11% 07% 13457 Xar
1817 18% 11% 09% 08% 08% 13% 30% 13402 THRILLHO
2666 16% 14% 14% 14% 13% 12% 13% 13159 Randomperfection
1645 18% 14% 15% 13% 13% 12% 12% 12627 charliedontsurf
0958 22% 12% 12% 13% 14% 14% 11% 12460 caesar-blue
1632 13% 17% 15% 14% 14% 12% 13% 10457 Crazy Smurf
1359 17% 15% 11% 09% 13% 13% 18% 10190 greekboi
1797 14% 16% 14% 12% 14% 14% 14% 09447 nodice4u
1242 16% 16% 13% 13% 13% 14% 13% 09373 TheBetterYodel
1168 11% 14% 15% 19% 19% 13% 05% 08894 skrumgaer
0834 17% 16% 14% 08% 11% 14% 17% 08726 toad92
0740 15% 16% 13% 17% 16% 11% 09% 08624 Kibble95
1099 13% 16% 14% 12% 11% 15% 14% 07297 pooch723
0983 16% 13% 13% 12% 10% 14% 20% 06319 wrestlerchance
Here are the end of November standings:
0964 24% 18% 20% 12% 09% 08% 06% 26184 grandgnu
6652 14% 16% 16% 16% 13% 12% 10% 25137 dottir
5510 19% 13% 11% 11% 15% 14% 14% 21349 dirtyrolls
1648 21% 17% 16% 10% 11% 10% 13% 20963 1st.skyler
1663 20% 18% 12% 13% 13% 11% 09% 20069 Mercantile
1637 21% 18% 12% 10% 09% 12% 15% 20046 kdiceplaya!
1632 20% 17% 10% 11% 11% 11% 17% 17769 chaiNblade
0692 21% 21% 15% 13% 10% 11% 06% 17549 Mazaman
2424 17% 16% 15% 12% 11% 12% 13% 16899 Lady Lite
0678 21% 18% 17% 12% 13% 08% 06% 16846 montecarlo
1217 17% 19% 16% 13% 14% 10% 08% 16780 DrunkDaShiVa
1454 20% 15% 15% 13% 14% 10% 11% 16663 Fonias
0723 15% 20% 20% 18% 12% 08% 04% 16340 SirPepa781
1449 19% 18% 10% 11% 15% 10% 13% 16055 Gurgi
3232 16% 16% 13% 11% 12% 14% 15% 15463 Az_Balu
1557 17% 15% 17% 14% 12% 10% 11% 15081 stakaboo
2265 13% 16% 17% 12% 12% 12% 14% 13173 BAMMBI
2546 16% 14% 14% 14% 14% 12% 13% 12655 Randomperfection
1641 18% 14% 15% 13% 13% 12% 12% 12628 charliedontsurf
1727 16% 15% 14% 16% 12% 12% 11% 12468 ehervey
0932 22% 12% 12% 13% 14% 14% 11% 12295 caesar-blue
1551 18% 11% 09% 07% 08% 13% 30% 12225 THRILLHO
0865 15% 19% 17% 14% 12% 11% 41% 11919 Xar
1277 18% 16% 11% 09% 13% 13% 17% 10662 greekboi
1632 13% 17% 15% 14% 14% 12% 13% 10457 Crazy Smurf
1164 16% 16% 13% 13% 13% 14% 13% 09354 TheBetterYodel
1742 14% 16% 14% 12% 14% 14% 14% 09210 nodice4u
0662 19% 14% 12% 11% 09% 11% 20% 08752 ji-jo
0834 17% 16% 14% 08% 11% 14% 17% 08726 toad92
0731 15% 16% 13% 17% 16% 11% 09% 08544 Kibble95
1122 11% 13% 15% 18% 19% 13% 06% 08457 skrumgaer
0994 13% 16% 14% 12% 11% 16% 15% 06545 pooch723
0972 16% 13% 13% 12% 10% 14% 19% 06352 wrestlerchance
The zero datum used was
07.2, 07.9, 10.2, 14.0, 17.5, 20.3, 22.9.
I have child-proofed the yearly TAZD, but I will not say in what way I have done it. The childproofing did not have to kick in in 2011.
***Special note: Actually the childproofing did kick in for Xar in the November standings, not because of any action of his, but by my compiling his January 2011 seventh place percentage as 14 instead of 14%. That happens if you don't include the final % sign when you capture the data with the mouse. Note that his final percentages added to 129%. Xar's corrected November standings should have been
0865 15% 19% 17% 14% 12% 11% 07% 13457 Xar
Here are the complete final standings:
7167 15% 16% 16% 16% 13% 11% 09% 28193 dottir
1036 24% 18% 20% 13% 09% 08% 06% 27003 grandgnu
5818 19% 13% 11% 11% 15% 14% 14% 21834 dirtyrolls
1648 21% 17% 16% 10% 11% 10% 13% 20963 1st.skyler
1641 21% 18% 12% 10% 09% 12% 16% 20017 kdiceplaya!
1743 20% 17% 13% 13% 13% 11% 10% 19795 Mercantile
0730 21% 21% 15% 13% 10% 10% 06% 18357 Mazaman
2596 17% 16% 16% 12% 11% 12% 13% 18217 Lady Lite
2124 18% 15% 16% 14% 12% 10% 11% 18050 stakaboo
0720 22% 18% 17% 12% 13% 08% 06% 18028 montecarlo
1632 20% 17% 10% 11% 11% 11% 17% 17769 chaiNblade
1217 17% 19% 16% 13% 14% 10% 08% 16780 DrunkDaShiVa
1472 20% 15% 15% 13% 14% 10% 11% 16732 Fonias
0732 15% 20% 20% 18% 12% 08% 04% 16708 SirPepa781
3504 16% 16% 12% 11% 12% 14% 15% 16239 Az_Balu
1497 19% 18% 09% 11% 15% 11% 14% 15976 Gurgi
2463 13% 16% 17% 13% 11% 12% 13% 13905 BAMMBI
1838 17% 15% 14% 16% 12% 12% 11% 13662 ehervey
0865 15% 19% 17% 14% 12% 11% 07% 13457 Xar
1817 18% 11% 09% 08% 08% 13% 30% 13402 THRILLHO
2666 16% 14% 14% 14% 13% 12% 13% 13159 Randomperfection
1645 18% 14% 15% 13% 13% 12% 12% 12627 charliedontsurf
0958 22% 12% 12% 13% 14% 14% 11% 12460 caesar-blue
1632 13% 17% 15% 14% 14% 12% 13% 10457 Crazy Smurf
1359 17% 15% 11% 09% 13% 13% 18% 10190 greekboi
1797 14% 16% 14% 12% 14% 14% 14% 09447 nodice4u
1242 16% 16% 13% 13% 13% 14% 13% 09373 TheBetterYodel
1168 11% 14% 15% 19% 19% 13% 05% 08894 skrumgaer
0834 17% 16% 14% 08% 11% 14% 17% 08726 toad92
0740 15% 16% 13% 17% 16% 11% 09% 08624 Kibble95
1099 13% 16% 14% 12% 11% 15% 14% 07297 pooch723
0983 16% 13% 13% 12% 10% 14% 20% 06319 wrestlerchance
Here are the end of November standings:
0964 24% 18% 20% 12% 09% 08% 06% 26184 grandgnu
6652 14% 16% 16% 16% 13% 12% 10% 25137 dottir
5510 19% 13% 11% 11% 15% 14% 14% 21349 dirtyrolls
1648 21% 17% 16% 10% 11% 10% 13% 20963 1st.skyler
1663 20% 18% 12% 13% 13% 11% 09% 20069 Mercantile
1637 21% 18% 12% 10% 09% 12% 15% 20046 kdiceplaya!
1632 20% 17% 10% 11% 11% 11% 17% 17769 chaiNblade
0692 21% 21% 15% 13% 10% 11% 06% 17549 Mazaman
2424 17% 16% 15% 12% 11% 12% 13% 16899 Lady Lite
0678 21% 18% 17% 12% 13% 08% 06% 16846 montecarlo
1217 17% 19% 16% 13% 14% 10% 08% 16780 DrunkDaShiVa
1454 20% 15% 15% 13% 14% 10% 11% 16663 Fonias
0723 15% 20% 20% 18% 12% 08% 04% 16340 SirPepa781
1449 19% 18% 10% 11% 15% 10% 13% 16055 Gurgi
3232 16% 16% 13% 11% 12% 14% 15% 15463 Az_Balu
1557 17% 15% 17% 14% 12% 10% 11% 15081 stakaboo
2265 13% 16% 17% 12% 12% 12% 14% 13173 BAMMBI
2546 16% 14% 14% 14% 14% 12% 13% 12655 Randomperfection
1641 18% 14% 15% 13% 13% 12% 12% 12628 charliedontsurf
1727 16% 15% 14% 16% 12% 12% 11% 12468 ehervey
0932 22% 12% 12% 13% 14% 14% 11% 12295 caesar-blue
1551 18% 11% 09% 07% 08% 13% 30% 12225 THRILLHO
0865 15% 19% 17% 14% 12% 11% 41% 11919 Xar
1277 18% 16% 11% 09% 13% 13% 17% 10662 greekboi
1632 13% 17% 15% 14% 14% 12% 13% 10457 Crazy Smurf
1164 16% 16% 13% 13% 13% 14% 13% 09354 TheBetterYodel
1742 14% 16% 14% 12% 14% 14% 14% 09210 nodice4u
0662 19% 14% 12% 11% 09% 11% 20% 08752 ji-jo
0834 17% 16% 14% 08% 11% 14% 17% 08726 toad92
0731 15% 16% 13% 17% 16% 11% 09% 08544 Kibble95
1122 11% 13% 15% 18% 19% 13% 06% 08457 skrumgaer
0994 13% 16% 14% 12% 11% 16% 15% 06545 pooch723
0972 16% 13% 13% 12% 10% 14% 19% 06352 wrestlerchance
|
dottir wrote
at 6:19 AM, Friday December 2, 2011 EST To Grandnu: Lol, that's emotional blackmail!
|
|
superxchloe wrote
at 10:19 AM, Friday December 2, 2011 EST "you have to admit how difficult is to keep the rhythm when you play more and more games"
So why play so many games, if it negatively affects you? Hey skrum, didn't you say failing strategies should be discarded? Do you think you deserve to be rewarded over someone who has played only 660 games (the minimum) but has the following percentage profile: 27% 17% 15% 12% 12% 14% 3% (This yields a TAZD of 22724.) 660 games isn't exactly a small sample, here- just like monte's 678 isn't small. Over that many games you can expect someone's percentage profile to be truly representative of their skill. That percentage profile is clearly superior to yours; I don't think you'll argue with me there. I'm all for encouraging more games, but taken to such an extreme as you have shouldn't be rewarded. In case you're curious, here are the current annual TAZD*s for you, grandgnu, and monte. 24647 grandgnu 16994 montecarlo 16979 dottir grandgnu and monte fit the mold of the TAZD*: not unreasonably large number of games, positive deviations in every place. Their scores should match the TAZD but since I'm using the posted data rather than exact numbers there's some rounding error involved. However, TAZD* caps at 300 games. You also have a negative deviation for fourth places, which hurts your score. Without any games weighting: 811 grandgnu 652 montecarlo 296 dottir food for thought. |
|
montecarlo wrote
at 10:30 AM, Friday December 2, 2011 EST thanks for the legwork chloe. one last minor question i posed to skrum earlier...
gnu's total percentages add up to 97, whereas mine add up to 95. what happens to the tazd* if you normalize those to 100? i understand he will still be ahead of me, but i wonder how much i might gain from that normalization, if any. <3 |
|
|
superxchloe wrote
at 10:35 AM, Friday December 2, 2011 EST I'll get back to you on that soon. :) I've got to get to work on my schoolwork; I've procrastinated long enough hah.
|
|
|
dottir wrote
at 11:45 AM, Friday December 2, 2011 EST "So why play so many games, if it negatively affects you?"
Really surprised with the question...I play so many games because I LIKE PLAYING KDICE...Where is the fun if i have to stop playing to win the TADZ/TADZ*? That would have no sense. Kdice is a game, to have fun and enjoy it, thats the main and people forget it all the time. In the other hand, challenges are part of the fun, so you can play to get a medal, or just to get 1st each game, like you can play 100-500-2k-5k tables depending of the game-style you prefer. Meanwhile, you can join the TADZ to analize how you are doing, and it can be a new personal challenge if you want, not a funny one if the way to get it is not to play anymore though... |
|
grandgnu wrote
at 11:59 AM, Friday December 2, 2011 EST Don't worry Dottir, after I snag my crown I'll take you under my wing and teach you to be an elite player just like me!
|
|
|
superxchloe wrote
at 1:34 PM, Friday December 2, 2011 EST So you play because you enjoy playing. That's fine, but playing lots of games obviously is not a good strategical move if you're trying to improve your TAZD. So, it should not help your TAZD. Pretty straightforward.
|
|
skrumgaer wrote
at 2:54 PM, Friday December 2, 2011 EST Playing more games, for a given percentage profile, will improve your TAZD. After a point, it does not improve your TAZD*. The TAZD* penalizes those who love the game.
|
|
|
montecarlo wrote
at 3:23 PM, Friday December 2, 2011 EST correction: the TAZD penalizes those who are not obsessed with the game.
|
|
|
dottir wrote
at 4:39 PM, Friday December 2, 2011 EST "That's fine, but playing lots of games obviously is not a good strategical move if you're trying to improve your TAZD"
Well,actually it is...so people is complaining about that... Im just saying that i won't be interested in TADZ if that means that i will have to ask myself to not play more games (and any yearly competition rewarding players who doesnt even play during months is not a real "yearly" competition). To be interested or not in a currently competition is a personal choice. If you are the best atlethe running the 100 meters, you havent to be the best running a marathon too, even you havent to be interested on it, and nobody will think you are a bad atlethe because of that. Not a reason to question the rules of the marathon or the capacities of the runners...That's little bit disrespectful. Anyway, just my opinion |
