Forum
There should be a "Ryan should NOT do this" option for ideas
MadWylli wrote
at 4:18 PM, Friday December 29, 2006 EST |
197 people think this is a good idea
OviloN wrote
at 7:35 PM, Thursday May 8, 2008 EDT isn't he some kind of kdice god? :)
|
Grunvagr wrote
at 10:26 PM, Thursday June 5, 2008 EDT He's in the Pantheon.
|
shiggyman wrote
at 10:24 AM, Friday June 13, 2008 EDT NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
|
FemmeFatale wrote
at 4:40 PM, Friday June 13, 2008 EDT You mean, like a checkbox that says click here if you think this is a good idea or click here if you think this is a bad idea?
I think this is a good idea :P |
trevorh14 wrote
at 9:24 PM, Friday June 13, 2008 EDT this site lags like a bitch
|
FemmeFatale wrote
at 10:08 PM, Friday June 13, 2008 EDT Way to be on topic.
|
Beer Me! wrote
at 2:02 PM, Saturday June 21, 2008 EDT Sorry Ryan, I was too lazy to email you, so hopefully you can see this. I strongly believe this is the best game ever, but there is no online multiplayer version of Ashte Kashte. Can you please create it? I promise you it will be the best multiplayer game (besides chess, of course) ever created!
Single player version: http://www.denverpost.com/arcade/ci_2688331 More info: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashte_kashte Thanks! |
JokerXtreme wrote
at 1:22 AM, Monday December 1, 2008 EST Ryan should do this. Not voting and voting against is a different thing.
|
greenoaks wrote
at 7:06 AM, Sunday January 4, 2009 EST hurry up ryan and implement this
|
globIII wrote
at 8:51 AM, Friday May 1, 2009 EDT of course this should happen. Only a total numpty would think this is bad (and it seems many do). Maybe they are just thick or something. Instead of saying 165 agree, it would say 165 agree, 58 dissagree. This would reflect what people really want to see and make it easy for the developers to choose which improvements are worth making.
|