Forum
Pursey's September PPG Challenge
|
Pursey wrote
at 8:02 AM, Sunday September 2, 2012 EDT
PPG Challenge:
* Play at least 150 games in September. * Place in the Top 100. * Have the highest PPG at the end of the month (which will be checked at 11.30pm on September 30) out of participants in the challenge. * You must opt in to the challenge to be considered. Post "In, PPG" or similar to be considered. * No dodgy crap. If you think I'm not going to like your method of circumventing the spirit of the challenge then just ask me in chat or in the thread. * Pursey and Dugong are disqualified. I'm the sole judge of the competition. * If there's a PPG tie, then it will be won by whoever has the highest games played out of the two winners. * 12 months membership on offer. (Or, $30 cash if you already have membership). Thanks to @Pink_Taco831 who suggested this one. Carrie gets membership for not ignoring the thread and contributing. (Throw me a message and I'll fix it up when you're ready). |
|
AIex wrote
at 9:56 AM, Sunday September 2, 2012 EDT so the one winning gold is getting members?
|
|
|
Pursey wrote
at 10:02 AM, Sunday September 2, 2012 EDT Nah, thanks to the fact that highest PPG /= 1st place.
|
|
|
Pursey wrote
at 10:04 AM, Sunday September 2, 2012 EDT To expand on that, check out the August stats. Tournament points don't count in PPG. Boosts don't. Etc.
Plus, you can play 600 games and come 1st or 160 games and come 4th, and you're probably going to win on 9th in this challenge because your PPG is likely to be higher. |
|
Gurgi wrote
at 11:05 AM, Sunday September 2, 2012 EDT I wouldn't have even won this last month
I can never play more than 150 games |
|
|
Gurgi wrote
at 11:07 AM, Sunday September 2, 2012 EDT I still think it should be (most kills*ppg ) = prize
This is boring imo and requires too many games |
|
|
Gurgi wrote
at 11:10 AM, Sunday September 2, 2012 EDT it balances out games played because you need games played to get kills
But I wouldn't force more than 35 games |
|
|
Pursey wrote
at 11:39 AM, Sunday September 2, 2012 EDT I've considered kill based challenges but the issue is collusion becomes a huge problem. You also get people deliberately preventing your kill when they know there's a challenge on (via flagging etc).
|
|
kam|k2 wrote
at 11:58 AM, Sunday September 2, 2012 EDT Well, what about just highest kills in generals?
We could use 0 tables for that even, plus newcomers got a chance to win it too. Highest PPG with 150 games +, that really attracts heavy PGA / OTF'ing, not sure if that's what you wanted in the first place. |
|
i want a 0 table wrote
at 4:40 AM, Monday September 3, 2012 EDT most non-member tourny wins would be nice
only by one account so they cant win like 20 freerolls |
|
|
i want a 0 table wrote
at 4:41 AM, Monday September 3, 2012 EDT <wrestler
|
