Forum
LOWER THE POINT LIMITS TO SIT ON 500s PLEASE
|
@Vashthestabde wrote
at 5:10 AM, Tuesday December 6, 2011 EST
Seriously these noobs need to stop being scared of 2k/5k
|
|
Louis Cypher wrote
at 5:54 AM, Tuesday December 6, 2011 EST The losses occurring at 2k/5k and the long time it'll take to get there again is one thing that keeps many from going there.
The fact that they have at least 98% loss probability is another. The game is different there and it is very hard to get into that style of gaming (note: I did not say anything about cheating!) I don't see how a lower 500 limit should solve these issues. |
|
MadHat_Sam wrote
at 10:42 AM, Tuesday December 6, 2011 EST If you all weren't such cocknozzles to players on the 2/5ks they would play them more often. Being a cocknozzle to players is one of my specialties so I know what I am talking about here.
|
|
Louis Cypher wrote
at 12:21 PM, Tuesday December 6, 2011 EST I guess I'd be impressed by your wisdom if only I knew what a "cocknozzle" was...
|
|
@Vashthestabde wrote
at 2:16 PM, Tuesday December 6, 2011 EST It would force a larger amount of players to learn how to play on a 2k/5k. Sam, I will be less of a cocknozzle (noted!).
|
|
MadHat_Sam wrote
at 2:28 PM, Tuesday December 6, 2011 EST I agree the limit should be lowered, but you have to realize that many players avoid the higher tables because of the rampant favor trading and retarded reliance on social dynamics over strategic game play.
|
|
montecarlo wrote
at 2:32 PM, Tuesday December 6, 2011 EST would be hilarious if Ryan implemented a max number of characters a player could type in chatbox during each game.
|
|
THRILLHO wrote
at 9:15 PM, Tuesday December 6, 2011 EST Perhaps just be less of a faggot vash and people might want to play with you.
|
|
loophole wrote
at 9:17 PM, Tuesday December 6, 2011 EST ^
|
|
Gurgi wrote
at 10:35 PM, Tuesday December 6, 2011 EST +1 for monte
|
|
Vermont wrote
at 9:03 AM, Wednesday December 7, 2011 EST +1 for monte. That would be pretty interesting!
|