Forum
Dottir takes November TAZD.
|
skrumgaer wrote
at 9:57 AM, Thursday December 1, 2011 EST
The TAZD and baseball-style standings are explained on my Wall. At least 35 regular games played in the month are require to qualify for the monthly TAZD. Shown are Games Behind, TAZD, and player name.
GB TAZD Player 06 12178 dottir 13 11141 Emre Oguz 03 10171 masticore 00 9719 Invola 39 9539 Shevar 03 8878 OneShot7 18 8842 jona_vicente 06 8419 savif 22 8352 [Ocean]Flushed 32 8336 Mazaman 02 8224 toms 10 8170 what_up23 47 8155 jfdis 08 8113 @ata 24 8064 Az_Balu 17 7666 kostur 20 7604 L3xy 48 7603 bcmatteagles 16 7600 22-Apr 11 7427 Lady Lite 07 7406 Vollhonk 66 7294 Scabbard 26 7159 kdiceplaya! 22 6840 chaiNblade 29 6829 IFIGENIUS 17 6518 FPP 24 6504 _smile_ 69 6474 Remiel 43 6441 Simmo3k 40 6411 Mercantile 12 6397 xjxaxnx 11 6328 @Toomyfriends 93 6315 franklyghost 14 6259 Bu7Ch3r 34 6214 fish28 18 6129 Free Flags 19 6043 hcdug 24 5928 kudoukun 18 5921 ovbogaert 14 5907 peter luftig 36 5658 @engr2002 49 5588 EddyB 22 5474 @MikeTamburini 31 5398 Brighty 30 5333 fearlessflyer 39 5281 Lord Death 92 5210 Loobee 35 5123 Gurgi 66 5087 barmat 21 5065 joero14 66 5054 Jily 40 5044 hatty 33 4952 longpube 32 4921 NikkeKnatterton 29 4841 scarp8 54 4794 stackshotbilly 34 4784 OviloN 66 4733 Silesia 100 4730 axlehammer 45 4623 mrb2097 47 4600 nexon 21 4582 Volvic 23 4484 beatol 33 4471 Fatman_x 25 4411 KDancer 41 4306 xXxJozefxXx 25 4289 Keeley 26 4019 euphrates7 87 4003 Rsquared 36 3917 Poker Style 48 3808 "MC" 34 3760 haloducks 41 3641 bivo 69 3261 orestis85 52 3201 greekboi 73 3179 cool g 33 2960 MNK10 57 2817 Trkz 58 2784 greenman 65 2759 These tards suck 76 2714 GreGGwar 70 2500 absolutgimlet 61 2463 Johnboat 44 2285 Kingofskillz 84 2218 DonnieScribbles 93 2208 GR3ENMAN 73 2028 CCSKAOT 94 1253 Kdot 92 1248 ji-jo |
|
Vermont wrote
at 12:02 PM, Friday December 2, 2011 EST Congrats on being the most deviant. ;)
(It's still cool to win it, congrats.) |
|
jurgen wrote
at 12:07 PM, Friday December 2, 2011 EST the only reason you would go for zero dates of 0-1 0-2 etc is to avoid having the problem of having 9-7 and 7-9 having the same tazd with a 8-8 zero datum (well any other zero date that isn't O-X).
With that system you only have positive effects for a win so 9-7 will indeed show a better skill and higher tazd compared to 7-9 |
|
|
skrumgaer wrote
at 12:33 PM, Friday December 2, 2011 EST In kdice you can take the wins away. Blow a few games and you are back in the zero datum.
|
|
|
Vermont wrote
at 12:36 PM, Friday December 2, 2011 EST Same for football if you use the same logic for picking your zero datum.
|
|
|
Vermont wrote
at 12:37 PM, Friday December 2, 2011 EST Jurgen, your point nicely hilights why treating positive and negative deviation as equally 'skilled' gives erroneous results.
|
|
|
jurgen wrote
at 2:27 PM, Friday December 2, 2011 EST excellent point Vermont :)
|
|
|
skrumgaer wrote
at 2:31 PM, Friday December 2, 2011 EST Why should I use the same logic in picking the zero datum for football as for kdice, since the zeros are different? In football, losses are not forgiven. In kdice, losses that result in a negative PPG are forgiven. So since the behavioral incentives are different, why should the logics for picking the zero datum be the same?
|
|
pooch723 wrote
at 5:13 PM, Friday December 2, 2011 EST Skrum, so NOW you decided to change at almost end of year. WOW; did you ever come to figure out people have more then one acct in, that they put into the top 100? What a crock for this now if you ask me.
|
|
|
skrumgaer wrote
at 5:29 PM, Friday December 2, 2011 EST Change what?
|
|
|
Vermont wrote
at 5:51 PM, Friday December 2, 2011 EST I wasn't aware that TAZD took PPG into account, skrum. I thought it focused only on the percentages and number of games played as means of ranking.
|
