If everyone ignores Veta will he go away?

Doubt it.

I bet he'd make alts to counter his opinions.

Sounds like a Downy type thing to do.

That is all.

I don't think cheating was ever socially acceptable on this site Rob, and I find it hilarious that you're trying to justify monte's scheming and cheating while at the same time admonishing me for doing the same early in my career.

Thraxle, I believe you are wrong. It is all about consistencies and I go to the point I made in the other discussion;

1) Is there a rule that forbids the use of certains words on KDice website: Yes, I believe so (it would be good to produce the list by the way so that our young fellow friends who enjoyed insulting their KDice mates know)
2) Can we get banned for the use of these words: It appears to me that the answer is yes again.
3) Do we agree that assimilating KDice with Nazis' concepts (I still wait for your answer on this point) on this website is not what we all dream of? I hope, once again, that the answer is yes.
4) So if all this is correct, I believe actions need to be taken against Sam, as otherwise we would be inconsistent.

LOL, if you're going to simply repeat your same posts I'll simply repeat my response below:

No, there is no list. There is a rule against "hate speech". Please give me your definition for "hate speech". (It'll be different from someone else's definition)

Sam can't be moderated as he has Advisor status. Advisor's can't be banned.

Submit any and all complaints to the only person that can change and Advisors status.......Ryan.

[email protected]

Veta, you missed out on the great rise of the cabal, anti-cabal, leekstep, flagfest and the many kcontroversies over the year. Never once did anyone ever act as bad as you did.

There were no rules then, wasn't until fierogate that Ryan actually somewhat put in rules. Know your khistory before you make any more claims.

Veta never needs facts, he simply uses his own opinion and conjecture.

:)

Sorry, I missed your earlier answer. Fairt point. Now do you believe my point would be stronger if other mods would agree with me (and actually if Veta would disagree with me)?

I'm pretty sure that still means that compromising the competitive integrity of the game was never at any point in time socially acceptable by the community.

You weren't around when it was elo, were you?

It was actively encouraged to only sit with a minimum of 2 "friends" otherwise you were putting your high elo at risk.

It's still actively encouraged to play with people you are familiar with on high stakes tables because you'll know their playing style better. That hasn't changed. Good night matty.