Forum
To Amber Dyer
|
apa235 wrote
at 2:33 PM, Wednesday August 3, 2011 EDT
To Amber Dyer:
You have by no reason forced me to change avatar. My avatar did not brake any of the rules applying to kdice.com. My avatar was also approved by another moderator called Bone Roller. I find your behavior outrageous and urge you to give me back all my privileges. I also expect an apology. apa235 |
|
trendz wrote
at 1:39 AM, Thursday August 4, 2011 EDT fuck u motha fucka
|
|
kakku man wrote
at 2:23 AM, Thursday August 4, 2011 EDT show pic!!!
|
|
Amber Dyer wrote
at 6:39 AM, Thursday August 4, 2011 EDT LOL you all crack me up. He does have all privileges back because I noticed that he changed his av. That is the only reason why he got them back. Now if Mr. Roller tells me that he did approve your av then I'll give you an apology, until then you'll just have to deal with the facts. And maybe you should read the rules again while you are at it!
|
|
mr Kreuzfeld wrote
at 6:48 AM, Thursday August 4, 2011 EDT pics or it didn't happen, show us the AV amber. I am too scared to open alta vista and type to find pr0nish myself
you guys remember altavista? or when one used to take the free tour of the website every time ? |
|
Loobee wrote
at 6:59 AM, Thursday August 4, 2011 EDT Taking away all his play privleges seems a little excessive, no?
Why not just -avatar him? Was his avatar really THAT offensive? |
|
Amber Dyer wrote
at 9:17 AM, Thursday August 4, 2011 EDT tbh loobee it was to me, I'm not telling anyone what the av was nor do I have to. I'm just happy that the av was changed. Also like I stated before if Roller says that he approved it I will apologize to apa.
|
|
Amber Dyer wrote
at 9:21 AM, Thursday August 4, 2011 EDT hmm didnt post so ill repeat.. if it shows twice sorry.
tbh loobee it was to me. Also I am not telling what the av was nor do i have to. I am just glad that it is changed now. But like I stated before if I hear that Roller approved it I will say i am sorry to apa. |
|
montecarlo wrote
at 9:24 AM, Thursday August 4, 2011 EDT i agree with loo here, theres a reason that -avatar and -play are 2 different options and there isnt just one crude -ban.
i still disagree with BR about megabanning greek for crude chat. i understand his reasoning is similar to california's three strike policy, where the size of the third strike doesnt matter, just the fact that a third strike happened. but i still say ban a player according to the specific offense he committed. meh. |
|
jurgen wrote
at 9:25 AM, Thursday August 4, 2011 EDT I think I know what the avatar was and even if BR agrees it was OK, It was against the general KDice rules.
I am going to agree with AMber in part: She was right in banning that avatar if she was offended or felt I was against Kdice rules. She also is not required to say what the avatar was although it might get some of the people who are ganging up on her without knowing what the av was of her back. I don't agree on the method used though Best approach for offensive avatars imo: reset it so it becomes a smiley. Check a few days later to see if he keeps his avatar acceptable. If he puts something offensive back, then you can remove his right to use an avatar. And if it really was an offensive avatar, imo, you can add a few days of -play. |
|
jurgen wrote
at 9:28 AM, Thursday August 4, 2011 EDT PS: for people putting nazi symbols, I reset and immediately remove ability to change av
You don't need to be warned for obvious big no no's imo |