Forum
Flagging someone means you finish below them still, right?
|
Cal Ripken wrote
at 8:39 AM, Wednesday August 3, 2011 EDT
Unless something's changed - has it?
If person A flags person B and then person B starts to fight person C, if person C wins, A flags below B...unless everyone agreed that it was a 1/3 fight, right? A and C don't get to claim it as a 1/3 fight, unless B agrees. Also, A doesn't get to say "oh well now I truce C, and truce>flags" because truce>flags only holds true when honoring what place to put people below you in - i.e. rewarding truce partners. It doesn't nullify your flag just because you want to truce. Unless this games turned really fucked up while I was away. Enlighten me, please. |
« First
‹ Previous
Replies 11 - 18 of 18
|
ma1achai wrote
at 3:08 PM, Wednesday August 3, 2011 EDT With that said, I don't think it is unreasonable for someone to treat their flag as a way of 'silent trucing' (with the intent of giving the other guy the higher position). But fighting for that person to get a better position is just that... a truce.
|
|
Vermont wrote
at 3:27 PM, Wednesday August 3, 2011 EDT There are big differences between real flags and vflags; not sure which you're referring to.
|
|
|
Cal Ripken wrote
at 3:45 PM, Wednesday August 3, 2011 EDT vflags
|
|
|
Cal Ripken wrote
at 3:46 PM, Wednesday August 3, 2011 EDT vflagging is clearly not "I wont attack you anymore if you dont attack me"
if anything, that's a truce. Not the result of someone saying "I flag" |
|
damncows wrote
at 8:56 PM, Wednesday August 3, 2011 EDT Too much bullshit.I love this game, but can't find more than 2or3 games a night that arn't screwed by cheats and pga's backstabbing blatant lies,guys suiciding to their buddies. Its not a game like this.I agree with the harshest measures needed to stop this cancer.please help clean this shit.
|
|
trendz wrote
at 1:40 AM, Thursday August 4, 2011 EDT There is a simple one word answer for this question.
no |
|
kdiceplaya! wrote
at 1:46 AM, Thursday August 4, 2011 EDT Solution: When accepting a flag, give the condition that they must fight for 2nd and cannot just sit for 2nd. If they disagree/don't answer, then you kill them.
|
|
|
Vermont wrote
at 10:54 AM, Thursday August 4, 2011 EDT Bottom line: flags were only introduced to help the game end faster.
This is a war game. People kill stuff. People will try to use diplomacy (chat) to get you to not kill their stuff. If someone attacks you and you weren't expecting it, deal with it. (Frickin Japan, I thought we were silent truced, and you backstabbed me in Pearl Harbor. wtf?) Someone dig up that WWII thread. That one should almost be on a rotation to automatically re-bump every six months or so. ramble ramble ramble... |
