Forum
My congressman (Anthony Weiner) just showed his weiner on twitter
|
deadcode wrote
at 12:32 PM, Wednesday June 1, 2011 EDT
I didn't vote for him!
http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/tue-may-31-2011/distinguished-member-of-congress Shouldn't congressmen be smart enough to know you can't pick up young boys via twitter; without picking up national attention. Even if he was hacked; still hilarious and deserved. In other news; DOW -200; GOLD UP; Jobs Down; QE3 Coming soon; 'WE ARE ON THE VERGE OF A GREAT, GREAT DEPRESSION' - Yastraw Thanks Keynesians! |
|
|
deadcode wrote
at 6:33 AM, Wednesday June 15, 2011 EDT Update:
Weiner has entered sex rehab. Pelosi and Obama are now both calling for his resignation. As I predicted before Weiner's resignation is probably coming soon. |
|
|
deadcode wrote
at 8:31 AM, Wednesday June 15, 2011 EDT National Enquirer just released photos of Weiner "oiled up" and another with him cross dressing; yes; cross dressing.
This story is now officially weird as hell. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2003804/Anthony-Weiners-wife-Huma-Abedin-returns-home-cross-dressing-images-emerge.html |
|
dasfury wrote
at 9:20 AM, Wednesday June 15, 2011 EDT Gasland. good watch.
|
|
boogybytes wrote
at 9:41 AM, Wednesday June 15, 2011 EDT Exactly what part of the constitution prohibits the EPA?
|
|
|
boogybytes wrote
at 9:43 AM, Wednesday June 15, 2011 EDT Also these new photos aren't that weird. They taken in the eighties at a college party or something. People just digging things up and feigning outrage to create fake controversy.
|
|
MadHat_Sam wrote
at 9:57 AM, Wednesday June 15, 2011 EDT Pollution is pretty interstate commercey deadcode.
|
|
|
deadcode wrote
at 10:29 AM, Wednesday June 15, 2011 EDT Boogy: "Exactly what part of the constitution prohibits the EPA?"
You inadvertently made my point for me. Let me explain. The US Constitution is a list of enumerated powers. (Article I, section 8) Meaning anything not explicitly mentioned as a power of the federal government is not allowed. So it is not up to me to show "what part of the constitution prohibits the EPA", on the contrary, it is up to you to show me where it is explicitly allowed (which it isn't). Sam, the interstate commerce clause was originally intended to stop the common practice, at the time, of states taxing goods passing through their state on the way to other states. The current practice of using the "general welfare clause" and the commerce clause; to enable the federal government to have unlimited power is a perversion of the constitution. This is thoroughly documented in memoirs of the founders. They were very worried about the possibility of future leaders to use these clauses as a blank check. |
|
|
deadcode wrote
at 10:33 AM, Wednesday June 15, 2011 EDT Boogy: "... People just digging things up and feigning outrage to create fake controversy."
Once again Boogy; who is outraged (besides you)? |
|
|
deadcode wrote
at 10:43 AM, Wednesday June 15, 2011 EDT Sam, I just realized that you said that pollution is interstate commerce. Can you explain that? It doesn't make any sense to me.
|
|
|
boogybytes wrote
at 10:50 AM, Wednesday June 15, 2011 EDT You're the one who said this: "This story is now officially weird as hell."
Feigned shock. |
