Forum


Rob, who do i vote for for governor
RichardCheese wrote
at 8:05 PM, Saturday October 2, 2010 EDT
a dick (Jerry Brown)
or a cunt (Meg Whitman)

Replies 1 - 10 of 24 Next › Last »
Thraxle wrote
at 10:38 PM, Saturday October 2, 2010 EDT

I like cunts more than dicks, sooooooo...

Wait, which one is Republican?
noamlang1 wrote
at 10:43 PM, Saturday October 2, 2010 EDT
so schwarzenegger is no longer governor? where will I get my laughs from?
RichardCheese wrote
at 1:17 PM, Sunday October 3, 2010 EDT
Meg Whitman is the republican candidate (also the bitch that killed ebay)
MadHat_Sam wrote
at 3:32 PM, Sunday October 3, 2010 EDT
Meg Whitman would be awful, and Jerry Brown's criticisms of her are spot on.

The problem is Jerry Brown's position of wanting tax cuts/raises be voter approved is fucking stupid and just a continuation of involving the retarded California electorate in the government too much as our awful proposition system has shown.

If Brown is really committed to cutting spending and increasing revenues in a intelligent manner he would be the lesser of two evils but I doubt it.

Fuck them both, they both suck.

Also please vote no on Prop 23 so I can keep my job, thank you.
leeeroy jenkins wrote
at 10:41 AM, Monday October 4, 2010 EDT
We're dicks! We're reckless, arrogant, stupid dicks. And the Film Actors Guild are pussies. And Kim Jong Il is an asshole. Pussies don't like dicks, because pussies get fucked by dicks. But dicks also fuck assholes: assholes that just want to shit on everything. Pussies may think they can deal with assholes their way. But the only thing that can fuck an asshole is a dick, with some balls. The problem with dicks is: they fuck too much or fuck when it isn't appropriate - and it takes a pussy to show them that. But sometimes, pussies can be so full of shit that they become assholes themselves... because pussies are an inch and half away from ass holes. I don't know much about this crazy, crazy world, but I do know this: If you don't let us fuck this asshole, we're going to have our dicks and pussies all covered in shit!
RichardCheese wrote
at 1:56 PM, Monday October 4, 2010 EDT
thank you for your input LJ, and Sam you are correct, but i feel the lesser of two evils is Meg but Jerry has the political experience
MadHat_Sam wrote
at 5:28 PM, Monday October 4, 2010 EDT
They both are bad choices, based on their platforms I feel Brown is less likely to do anything that would lead to further long term damage. The biggest issue facing the State is the broken budget process, experience may really mean something here if he is being honest about reforming the process.

Now while I am overall ambivalent about Brown and don't think he really is a great choice I have much more solid objections to Meg Whitman.

Here plans for public safety are archaic and do nothing but cost money with having little effect on the crime rate.
1. She is against legalization of marijuana, which is an implicit endorsement of the failed war on drugs. I am not for complete decriminalization of all narcotics, but what we are currently doing isn't working and we need to change course.
-Brown isn't supporting the legalization, most likely because it isn't a politically viable stance, but acknowledges the voters are going to decide and crafted the guidelines that California law enforcements use to deal with medical marijuana in accordance with the voters will in passing prop 225 in 1996.

2. She wants more prisons and no early release for non-violent offenders. This doesn't reduce the crime rate, it only increases the incarceration rate and costs the state insane sums of money. Prosecuting users is not the solution to crime, out-patient treatment for abuse and job training will go much further to reducing drug use and abuse as well as creating more useful members of society than just locking them up.

3. She opposes gay marriage and supports Prop 8. This is just asinine, I don't care if you like gay people or not but the government has no business legislating what two consenting adults call love or a marriage. This is a matter for religions and spiritual groups not for governments.

I could go on but this is too long already. Both are being retarded in not acknowledging that the budget needs to be a majority issue not a 2/3 vote, this is honestly the biggest problem with our states elected government. But fuck if any candidate could ever get elected saying changing this is a good idea, fucking masses are stupid and just don't get how bad this fucks up our state.

tl;dr have a good day.
its really chase wrote
at 6:57 PM, Monday October 4, 2010 EDT
tl;dr- democracy is dumb because people are dumb, so your vote really wont matter in the grand scheme of things
Thraxle wrote
at 7:04 PM, Monday October 4, 2010 EDT
There is a good job waiting for you in China.
MOTHER_OF_SATAN wrote
at 7:18 PM, Monday October 4, 2010 EDT
to add a bit to chases post:
indirect democracy is dumb, since the pleb has no ability to force the governing people.
So it like choosing between cancer and aids
KDice - Multiplayer Dice War
KDice is a multiplayer strategy online game played in monthly competitions. It's like Risk. The goal is to win every territory on the map.
CREATED BY RYAN © 2006 - 2026
GAMES
G GPokr
Texas Holdem Poker
K KDice
Online Strategy
X XSketch
Online Pictionary