It's easier to detect on the higher tables due to the point gains being much more dramatic.

It's easier to punish thanks to the source being more reliable. How many times per day does some random player post in the forum about some other random player PGAing? Does Ryan start banning based on one accusation? If blatant cheating occurs on a 2K or a 5K, there will be 3 or 4 people (if not more) backing up the claim that Player X and Player Y were PGAing.

So then why do the people who have numerous reviews stating that they PGA not have action taking any action. Does that say that "worse" players opinions mean less than "better" players? I don't understand how someone who is accused of PGA over and over again not have someone take action against them.

Some players aren't capable of analyzing moves and properly identify a PGA. An in-game silent truce might be viewed as a PGA to the untrained eye. People get pissed after they lose a game. Right after a game is when most reviews are written and they usually ARE BAD.

If you need me to define "in-game silent truce", I will. But if you need me to define that, you are one of the people not qualified to identify a PGA.

No.
I don't need it defined.
But thanks for the offer.

A point about it being a 0 table, this game needs new players all the time to come in, in some ways cheating on the 0 tables is one of the worse things you can do as it will put off players who try KDice and are then shouted at, accused of being a n00b and told to accept that fact that 3 people are working together as a PGA

I dont mind losing the points, i play for fun these days anyhoo, but it was just so blooming annoying and frustrating and it is such an easy thing to ban players like this. I think at least one of them was an Alt for some high level player anyhow, they should have all their accounts banned.

This is so funny. Almost as funny as it was when i fucked your mother Jund.

Ewwww necrophilliac alert! She must have beeen really squishy, shes been dead for 15 years!