Forum
Can we get mods..
|
Kehoe wrote
at 12:32 PM, Tuesday December 30, 2008 EST
Who aren't fucking completely clueless like Mystery Men? He took away Pat's avatar, the one I switched mine to, because of how it made him feel funny in his pants.
|
|
13u12n wrote
at 4:02 PM, Tuesday December 30, 2008 EST OK how about we take a vote? It seems to me if my av should be banned, the vote would say so correct? If the vote doesn't say so, that means this was all an abuse of power and my av should be reinstated.
|
|
Pat Whalen wrote
at 4:03 PM, Tuesday December 30, 2008 EST thats me ^^^^
i vote reinstatement |
|
Bahaduras wrote
at 4:12 PM, Tuesday December 30, 2008 EST Pat Whalen has had that av for a least a year (correct me if I am wrong) during that time Ryan has watched Pat Whalen play or been in the same room as Pat hundreds of times.... And can somebody who does not play in a community be an accurate gauge of community standards or Ryan standards? Ryan and other mods have banned hundreds of other avs that were pornography they never touched this one during all that time. The difference is that they actually play the game and have a feel for the community.
|
|
mr Kreuzfeld wrote
at 4:34 PM, Tuesday December 30, 2008 EST annat;
pornografy as defined by US law sexual conduct specifically defined by applicable state law; and that, taken as a whole, lack serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value. and to me it is pretty easy to see that pat whalens avatar has artistic value. and the only way to define "serious artistic value" is if enough people think it has artistic value. so by definition; it is not porn if enough people (percentwise*) think it is not porn. so judging by the posts here, almost all posts did think it was not porn. (this is only a pointer) but it looks to me like this does not fall into the definition of porn. therefor this is an action witch is not supported by any rules or laws. so what is the point of having rules if mods are going to behave like this? |
|
sunvic wrote
at 4:35 PM, Tuesday December 30, 2008 EST it's insane how much sense and logic you can throw at these guys yet nothing gets done, and they still think they're right, blows my fucking mind.
|
|
Mushu Porker wrote
at 6:00 PM, Tuesday December 30, 2008 EST Pat Whalen is an obnoxious, abrasive, self-absorbed git, but I must agree that his avatar is not pornographic.
|
|
wishbone wrote
at 7:16 PM, Tuesday December 30, 2008 EST the people who actually care about the site have about 0% say, just so there can never be a power struggle between strong minded persons.
|
|
baby phat wrote
at 7:34 PM, Tuesday December 30, 2008 EST I think I would be a great mod ryan and I really want to be one
|
|
baby phat wrote
at 7:34 PM, Tuesday December 30, 2008 EST I think I would be a great mod ryan and I really want to be one
|
|
JDizzle787 wrote
at 8:25 PM, Tuesday December 30, 2008 EST I sure as shit hope we don't cross paths, me and this mystery man. Ooh, you gonna ban me now cuz I swore?
just kidding, I couldn't hurt a fly, my words have never been that powerful anyways. +1 thought to the idea that yeah, that picture isn't porn, and millions of other similar pictures are plastered on magazine covers in thousands of stores worldwide in the magazine section, eye level or at least noticeable by a seven year old each day. So, your turn Mystery Man |