Forum
Top 20 in rank turned into TOP PPG at 07/18
|
AMO wrote
at 10:40 PM, Thursday July 17, 2008 EDT
19 jurgen 16419 50 278
5 montecarlo 33979 162 194 7 MadHat_Sam 29872 149 184 4 UpmaxM 40684 251 162 9 nuflis 23734 144 147 14 AMO 18706 147 127 3 kam|k2 41921 352 119 10 Rowdyazell 23003 174 118 6 just_jack 32949 280 118 1 potato27 45386 389 117 12 Die Another Day 20108 173 102 8 Snews88 29083 269 99 20 longhair 16208 177 92 2 Vohaul 43667 512 85 17 Dark_lunatic_K 17573 274 64 13 Johnson213 18915 297 64 11 franz ferdinand 21512 367 59 15 Orlafede 17732 353 50 16 thelooser 17634 376 47 18 Phospate 16446 409 40 (this time montecarlo's ppg is right ;)) And yeah..., i like the game but i cant play like a 1000 games per month... |
« First
‹ Previous
Replies 11 - 16 of 16
|
ltsply2 wrote
at 2:31 PM, Friday July 18, 2008 EDT AMO, I appreciate that points per game is points earned per game and not total points per game, but the difference is that when you start with 2500 then, unless you choose to play 0/100 tables then you will have higher PPG than nonmembers starting at 0. (This assumes equal likelihood of success at each level which clearly isn't the case, but that just furthers my point.)
Imagine I start at 0 and you start at 2500 and we both just keep getting 1st. My early firsts (at the 0 and 100 tables as I climb up) are worth considerably less PPG than your firsts. Sure we both approach the same total points after many games, but our PPG approaches the asymptote much more slowly... |
|
fiero600 wrote
at 3:49 PM, Friday July 18, 2008 EDT Johnson > Shevar
|
|
Shevar wrote
at 7:28 AM, Saturday July 19, 2008 EDT thats probably true, my dear fiero, considering that my hight only measures 173cm.
but if you are refering to kskill, which is hard to measure, then you might consider things like PPG, career ranking or some other stats. In that case comparing J and me would yield a different result. peace, Shev |
|
|
AMO wrote
at 7:52 PM, Saturday July 19, 2008 EDT kam: u played better drunk, no?
itsply: i understand ur point of view. i didnt pay although i can consider me also as a member of this but like in other months (and not in the elo and pre elo era) top positions are mostly for the players who played a lot... |
|
UpmaxM wrote
at 2:12 PM, Monday July 21, 2008 EDT Am i the 1st nonmember ?
Nice ;p |
|
kam|k2 wrote
at 9:10 PM, Monday July 21, 2008 EDT amo, i rly sucked in play, when i was drunk. but maybe i just sucked cause i first wanted only top100 - i rly dunno...
but fact is: my ppg suxx this month ^^ but theres rly a big difference between member and non-member. the lower tables rly kinda suck, and you need a bunch of games just to get above 2.500 points. but at least everyone can get a membership... who cares. |
