Forum
A sliding flag?
|
skrumgaer wrote
at 3:47 PM, Thursday July 17, 2008 EDT
If we had a sliding flag (where your flag rank changes automatically when your position changes), we would have these results that might improve the game.
1. If you flag at a high rank (2nd for example) and do no work to maintain your rank, it will eventually slip to 3rd, 4th, etc. But if you reach first place you are automatically unflagged. 2. If you flag at a low rank (such as 5th) and do no work to maintain your place, you wil eventally slip to last place and flag out. 3. Two players flagging at the same rank will not happen. Would these improve the game? |
« First
‹ Previous
Replies 11 - 12 of 12
|
algios wrote
at 10:46 AM, Saturday July 19, 2008 EDT Flagging soon makes sense with this system, then i would try to beat lower players in order to at the end try to take first. That would give rotten games.
from the sight of first: I own the game, I respect flags and then 2nd jumps on me while not hitting 3rd. I prefer my idea to autoend games when everybody is flagged: http://kdice.com/ideas/ideas/44763133. (This should not be discussed here) |
|
manbearpig wrote
at 5:18 PM, Saturday July 19, 2008 EDT The first parts of 1 works for me, unless you are completely surrounded by first, in which case you are in a craptastic situation anyways.
#3 definetly needs to happen. |
