Forum
The Alltime Leaderboard...
|
BatmanDan wrote
at 3:51 AM, Tuesday June 17, 2008 EDT
Who would be top of the leaderboard or top 10 if they kept playing, played under only one account?
examples riser X LUCK X rnd Mikeypoo integral stoude cleo CoMiK Grunvagr and anyone else you can think of! |
|
BatmanDan wrote
at 3:55 AM, Tuesday June 17, 2008 EDT also, who can you see getting to the top or near the top of the alltime list out of the newer players?
BR HR Class etc etc |
|
nuflis wrote
at 4:29 AM, Tuesday June 17, 2008 EDT This flagdice is stoude's paradise, dunno what would be his placement, but I'm sure he would be happy.
Top of the leaderboard, if he would be able to play 2 months in a roll without being banned, would be rnd. |
|
jurgen wrote
at 4:33 AM, Tuesday June 17, 2008 EDT Interesting thread but it is difficult to give a few names without forgetting to name other equally good ones.
you named most of the obvious ones but I will add 2 more: Phoenix37 MadifcantplayredWilly |
|
BatmanDan wrote
at 4:41 AM, Tuesday June 17, 2008 EDT Pheonix is a good one as i have seen him play and know he is good, never saw Mad Willy tho! General consensus amoung people i have spoke to is that X LUCK X was pretty awesome....although with 2 gold nuggets to his name...if rnd played only one account surely he would pwn everyone lol
|
|
Asshat wrote
at 7:04 AM, Tuesday June 17, 2008 EDT If all of the names you just just listed were to play 100 games, all alliances ignored, and no PGA//proxy and other such things you'd get a leaderboard that looked like this:
1. CoMik 2. X LUCK X 3. Stoude 4. Cleo 5. integral 6. rnd 7. Mikeypoo 8. riser 10. Grunvagr CoMik would win because he has the ability to manipulate the other players. While X LUCK X has superior tactics to all other players on that list, CoMik has the ability to manipulate the game to improve his position, and he does it extremely well. LUCK is "technically" better, however he lacks the social skills that can change the table. Stoude's #3 because he will be able to minimize his losses, similar to the Monte of 2008. Cleo has solid play and no enemies. integral's got the second best skill of the players listed, however his short attention span and his dislike of the 8v8 "luckfests" keep integral from solid placing game after game. Mikeypoo has more games than anyone ever played, however he's the technically the least skilled player to win a month. He won that month through sheer games and likability. rnd is lucky, but given players that understand his playing style and aren't affected by his account name ("Fear me: I am rnd!") he's pretty tame. Grun, sorry, but I don't see you placing any higher than 10th. |
|
BatmanDan wrote
at 7:07 AM, Tuesday June 17, 2008 EDT cool...there any other names u wud throw in the mixer?
|
|
nuflis wrote
at 8:26 AM, Tuesday June 17, 2008 EDT Hmmm, someone isn't really busy at work today...
|
|
MadHat_Sam wrote
at 10:25 AM, Tuesday June 17, 2008 EDT Fun, but you should also consider what would be the placement of some current players had they played as long as monte and petomni have.
|
|
BatmanDan wrote
at 10:36 AM, Tuesday June 17, 2008 EDT take that into consideration also...just trying to find out what kdice may have looked like with some of the older players still around
|
|
Judas∅ wrote
at 11:05 AM, Tuesday June 17, 2008 EDT none of the newer players could really hang with the older players. the older players relied on skill. remember, these were the first people to even use the chatbox. i doubt that any players in the past 10 months, other than soda pop, could keep with them game after game.
|