Forum
Table Limits (full explanation)
|
fiero600 wrote
at 10:47 AM, Monday June 2, 2008 EDT
non member table limits are like this:
0 level : max 500 100 level : max 2500 500 level : max 10,000 member table limits are like this: 0 level : max 3000 100 level : max 5000 500 level : max 12,500 explanation : If you're a member things are a bit different. They're different because the 2500 max creates a bit of a problem for members, who get 2500 at the start of the month. They would only be able to sit at 100 or 500... so for members the limits are are raised by 2500 each. Questions? Concerns? Comments? |
|
krez wrote
at 10:54 AM, Monday June 2, 2008 EDT HAHAHAHAH!!!! LOL! ROFL!
What a bullshit. When the members got their 2500, the explanation was "so they can sit on higher tables, without strugling on the lower 0 levels." Now the explanation is "so they can sit on the 0 tables, cauz they are so skilled, they lose all their points on the 1st game" This joke will keep me laughing during the month! Nice work! |
|
§ilverfox wrote
at 11:03 AM, Monday June 2, 2008 EDT Thanks for looking that up Fiero!
Only one point of consideration to bring forth: I seem to get 2500 pts at the beginning of the month. Then I contribute my monthly $5 and receive yet another 2500 pts. So from minute one (as I found out this month), I can play on no table lower than 500. This makes for some long waits since most are not yet able/willing to play on the 500 tables. |
|
dasfury wrote
at 11:09 AM, Monday June 2, 2008 EDT I disagree with different limits for members and non-members.
|
|
Shevar wrote
at 11:15 AM, Monday June 2, 2008 EDT i think its alright to have different limits for members. i mean those folks pay and should be able to play from day 1. there are times on the first days where you simply cant get a 500 going. das they just wanna play.
|
|
|
fiero600 wrote
at 11:17 AM, Monday June 2, 2008 EDT silverfox, you could perhaps just wait a few days to donate your $5?
|
|
Vermont wrote
at 11:34 AM, Monday June 2, 2008 EDT Different table limits based on membership status seem like a poor idea. Why create more of a potential rift between members and non-members?
Why not ask for "Questions? Concerns? Comments?" BEFORE the change is made? |
|
nuflis wrote
at 11:46 AM, Monday June 2, 2008 EDT Why not ask for "Questions? Concerns? Comments?" BEFORE the change is made?
Hey Verm, this is kdice.... do you remember the thread about mods, and the suggestions of the community?... Anyway, I like the table maximums and I don't care about the differentiation for members, I would never sit a 2500 account on a 0 or 100 table. I miss a limit for 2500 tables, though. In fact, the main problem in this sence is the lack of 10k games. |
|
|
Vermont wrote
at 12:32 PM, Monday June 2, 2008 EDT nuflis, there were tons of people that suggested Grun for a mod. Clearly the people's voices were heard. ;)
|
|
Ryan wrote
at 12:32 PM, Monday June 2, 2008 EDT believe it or not it was suggested by the community, I thought you two were there (verm & das)
|
|
wishbone wrote
at 12:36 PM, Monday June 2, 2008 EDT stop hijacking threads, fiero, thanks for the explanation, i like this idea, now we have to play higher tables to prove skills. thanks
|
