Forum
either stop the highers from playing..
|
greenman21262 wrote
at 12:51 AM, Tuesday May 27, 2008 EDT
in the lower rooms.... or let the lowers play in the higher rooms.... strategy counts.... and you're screwing it up
|
« First
‹ Previous
Replies 21 - 27 of 27
|
kdicefreak wrote
at 10:27 PM, Tuesday May 27, 2008 EDT i totally agree:
------------- if you have more then 500 ou should be allowed to play 0s if you have more then 2500 you shouldnt be allowed on the 100s and 0s if you have more then 10000 you shouldnt be allowed on 500 and lower that would be good Shev ---------------- |
|
fiero600 wrote
at 1:06 AM, Wednesday May 28, 2008 EDT that would def. not work for the bombardier players and shawshank players who get to the top by playing 1200 games a month
|
|
Shevar wrote
at 3:51 AM, Wednesday May 28, 2008 EDT Thrax,
if those restrictions would be implemented higher tables would fill quicker. |
|
MadHat_Sam wrote
at 11:42 AM, Wednesday May 28, 2008 EDT 0 and 100 tables should have maxs, like 5k+ gtfo of that 100 table.
|
|
Bone-Roller wrote
at 12:24 PM, Wednesday May 28, 2008 EDT 0 Tables = 500 max
100 Tables = 2500 max 500 Tables = 10,000 max 2500 Tables = 25,000 max |
|
jurgen wrote
at 4:35 AM, Thursday May 29, 2008 EDT the maxima are a great idea to get more people to play the tables they are supposed to play with their points total.
However I think a rigid 100% maximum would maybe limit play if not enough players are around. I am more in favor of a gradual limitation of the access to 500/2500 tables...something like this maybe 0 Tables = 500 max 100 Tables = 2500 max 500 Tables + a maximum of 75% of your games at 500 for players above 5,000 points + a maximum of 50% of your games at 500 for players above 7,500 points + a maximum of 25% of your games at 500 for players above 10,000 points 2500 Tables + a maximum of 75% of your games at 2500 for players above 15,000 points + a maximum of 50% of your games at 2500 for players above 20,000 points + a maximum of 25% of your games at 2500 for players above 25,000 points |
|
|
jurgen wrote
at 4:50 AM, Thursday May 29, 2008 EDT ummmm, to clarify my proposition (lol, I bet I will probably only confuse more people with my bad English):
The percentages should only take into account the games played when you are above 1 or more of the different point limits. So it is independent of the number of games you needed to get to 5,000. Example: When you get to 8k but you again drop below 7,5k, only your 5k+ tracker keeps ticking again, the 7,5k tracker obviously stops until you get back to more than 7,500 points. |
