awesome.....

Personally, I dont read all the threads who is pga with whome. Instead, if I have the feeling players might be "pgaming" i usually check their stats to see if they recently played at the same tables, if they write something suspicious in the chatbox and i observe their actions very closely. Sometimes it's pretty obvious and therefore I can often figure it out quickly. I think pga's are more comon at the higher tables when points really really matter to the players.

Because I usually play smaller tables I don't think it is that much of a problem! For those who think otherwise I doubt that reporting pgas in the forum is an efficient way to prevent it from happening!

there might be more important things but pga's are wasting the game in some way. just mho.

i havent encountered a single PGA this month, so to me its no big problem.

and besides, if two players PGA they still have 5 players to beat. and the PGA has to play very smart not to be detected and get COUNTERED.

to me a PGA with less than 3 players is not a big threat. ingame diplomatics are more efficient since you get to choose your allies based on stratedic evaluations.

anyways. PGA accusations are to be posted on the players notes. it doesnt belong in the discussion section, cause ther is nothing to discuss about that.

Well spoken Shev

I agree 100% with shevar

Awesomeness has a good point too no, one single thread where all pga connections can be posted sounds not that bad. I usually just read the titles of pga posts since luckily posters are kind of enough to put the names.

One good thread that incorporates them all would save me some time since then I can catch up with my pga gossip once a weak by reading that one alone.