Forum


new idea for flagging.
Sophalis wrote
at 11:06 AM, Monday March 3, 2008 EST
think about it.

why is it that, whenever someone wants to flag, they only have the option of flagging for whatever position they are currently in?

the three main reasons why people flag, currently (although correct me if i've missed a couple) are:

1) they have no chance of doing well / have been screwed over, and want out

2) they want to prove to whoever's in a higher position that they aren't a threat, when the higher placed player would otherwise feel threatened and concentrate his/her attacks on them

3) they've just ninja'd and want to say "flagged" in the chatbox, and whine if anyone attacks them that they aren't "respecting flags"

we've all had our fair share of the third kind, and, basically, they're really annoying. and i believe, although i may be wrong, that the second kind is why the new flagging system was originally implimented.

so how about if players were given the option to flag for any place (bar first, obviously) ?

this would /not/ mean that they "deserved" that place, simply that it was the highest they wanted to get in that game. this would pacify higher places, mean that players could make it completely clear what they wanted to get out of a game, and also give people the option to get out if they didn't want to be there any more. what's more, it would also save us the annoying situation of being third by one stack, having second flag, and first then take you out because you "haven't flagged", when all you wanted was a decent shot at second.

Replies 1 - 10 of 43 Next › Last »
lesplaydices wrote
at 11:07 AM, Monday March 3, 2008 EST
Sophie, you're so smart~~~
Sophalis wrote
at 11:12 AM, Monday March 3, 2008 EST
why does it say les has commented on this? he evidently hasn't
Sophalis wrote
at 11:12 AM, Monday March 3, 2008 EST
lol, ironically the comment appeared the moment i wrote that, making me look like a tool.
lesplaydices wrote
at 11:22 AM, Monday March 3, 2008 EST
Oh Sophie, you will never be considered a tool to me~
Spider J. wrote
at 11:32 AM, Monday March 3, 2008 EST
This is a neat idea.
MadHat_Sam wrote
at 11:38 AM, Monday March 3, 2008 EST
I vote for returning to the flag and surrender method, you hit that box you go away and your lands turn to grey, that was the best flagging system and involved so much less bitching.
Danny_DCB wrote
at 12:33 PM, Monday March 3, 2008 EST
Sam has a point! I think!
IWillDestroyU wrote
at 12:50 PM, Monday March 3, 2008 EST
i alwasy thought the flagging system sam mentions was the best. you flag, you're out.. move on.
sunvic wrote
at 1:04 PM, Monday March 3, 2008 EST
Les exlpained "~" to me once, he said it involved 4 guys and you being tied up with nothing on.

I was going to write a massive essay about this flagging but I seriously can't be bothered to explain myself, unless someone is genuinely interested that is.

In a nut shell, i prefer the 2nd method, If you can't crush your opponent you don't deserve to win. If someone wants to take their chances and they win, they deserve to win. If you are a pussy, you deserve to be IP banned....from the internet.

The 2nd system had slightly more communication and therefore trucing (thus pga'ing?). It also stopped 2nd from just flagging and then waiting for 3rd and below to be destroyed.

Play to win you fags.
lesplaydices wrote
at 1:19 PM, Monday March 3, 2008 EST
There's not a part of that post I didn't like.
KDice - Multiplayer Dice War
KDice is a multiplayer strategy online game played in monthly competitions. It's like Risk. The goal is to win every territory on the map.
CREATED BY RYAN © 2006 - 2026
GAMES
G GPokr
Texas Holdem Poker
K KDice
Online Strategy
X XSketch
Online Pictionary