Forum
"PGA detector" ruins the fun
|
Ssergio wrote
at 7:37 PM, Thursday February 14, 2008 EST
Last night I played 5 games in a row and had three 1st and two 2nd's. After that I couldn't sit with Chris for the whole month. (BTW: I played all these games sitting purple, the royal pimp army was on fire!)
After hearing about Chris not being able to sit with 3 ppl already and the "PGA connection" between Fin and Sam, I started to wonder. Ryan, I think it is a good basic idea, but don't you feel that the likes of me , chris, MadHat and Yellowfin aren't your most notorious PGA-players out there? Two weeks ago you called me "clear" and now I am marked as a PGA player? Sam helping Yellowfin win seems even more outrageous to me... I fear that at this rate you can close down the 10k rooms next week, because most combinations wont be able to sit. The battle for 1st / TOP 10 / TOP 25 will be less exciting then ever, because in one week top 10 wont be able to sit each other at the (high stakes) tables. Some people might wanna reply on this thread that this gives perspective to newer players, but we all know who plays the high stake tables and who doesn't. Like I said good basic idea, but you should be able to review the cases individually or use a week instead of a month to bench (and punish) certain combinations. Yours Truly, Ss |
« First
‹ Previous
Replies 11 - 13 of 13
|
integral wrote
at 7:35 AM, Friday February 15, 2008 EST yeah, let us cheat already!
|
|
kdicefreak wrote
at 8:06 AM, Friday February 15, 2008 EST well said eko.
PGAs are evil. |
|
MadHat_Sam wrote
at 10:01 AM, Friday February 15, 2008 EST I think the RC detector is a great idea but should use a larger sample size. I am not sure if Ryan has said what the sample size is but last I remember was he was going to use 10 games, which doesn't seem enough.
|