Forum
Thread for a truce-free kdice
|
38839798 wrote
at 7:18 PM, Friday November 30, 2007 EST
Now don't get me wrong! I hold no illusions whatsoever of ever seeing a truce-free kdice. There's no way of preventing truces, and even if there were, it probably wouldn't be implemented. I probably won't even get more than two people who agree with me. But God damn it, this thread is for bitching about truces, and I for one am going to do it!
I never truce! Truces are lame. They require no strategy on anyone's part. Someone says, "who wantz truce lolz?" and then truces with the first person who accepts. Then they proceed to gang bang the poor sap who would have won except that he doesn't make truces. The poor sap in this hypothetical situation is me. I know my score is terrible. Don't say I'm bitching just because I suck. I just said it. I'm bitching because I suck. BEAT YOU TO IT. That is all. |
« First
‹ Previous
Replies 11 - 15 of 15
|
dasfury wrote
at 7:03 PM, Sunday December 2, 2007 EST One day, ages ago, I won a 5v3....lame.
|
|
|
dasfury wrote
at 7:05 PM, Sunday December 2, 2007 EST nuflis for Secretary or Marine Agriculture!!
|
|
cifdtruckie wrote
at 10:08 PM, Sunday December 2, 2007 EST Does it make more sense for 2 equally strong people to fight over 1 corner all game and just weaken each other, or for those 2 people to truce and thereby strengthen each other? Quite often, choosing who to truce with and when to truce is a matter of skill in and of itself.
|
|
Snews88 wrote
at 12:35 AM, Monday December 3, 2007 EST "Making the game multiplayer has added a great politcal aspect on top of Dicewars’ mix of luck and strategy."
-Ryan www.rdews.com |
|
Beals wrote
at 2:14 AM, Monday December 3, 2007 EST I'm thinking most who play for fun agree a 1-2 truce is wussing out, and two smaller players trucing against a strong number one is more fun. Those in it for points are a different story.
|
