Forum
how about this Ryan?
|
|
Awsomeness! wrote
at 5:42 AM, Friday November 2, 2007 EDT
now of course u are the almighty one and what u say goes lol and i dont even jnow if this would work but i'll throw it in the air anyways.
all productive comments welcome from players too... instead of having a players RANK based from their SCORE, how about basing the RANK from the average points per game? let me simplify a lil... player x has 1000 POINTS and 50 games under his/her belt. his/her average POINTS per game would be 20. that would then become his SCORE and base players RANKS from thier SCORE. i know this would benefit the higher players more BUT, i would discourage high players playing on the lower tables and encourage the lower players to get to the next table-step rating...know what i mean? please only post if u are gona be productive. would be nice to hear from Ryan in particular... thanx awsome |
« First
‹ Previous
Replies 11 - 11 of 11
|
kiwiz wrote
at 1:12 PM, Monday November 5, 2007 EST some good idea!
that's why i posted yesterday to make a top25 for the -99games players maybe a top 10 for 1to99games another top10 for 100to199 [...] another top10 for 900to999 games (i'm sure there are some players who will play that much this month^^) |