Forum
Social understandings of higher table play
|
Aiden wrote
at 12:50 PM, Tuesday October 23, 2007 EDT
Fuck you muthafuka.....
Just kidding. Skrum suggested we have a little discourse about the psychological aspects of the game. My first point is that this is a unique game in that it is tactical left brained, random like life, and social right brained. Plenty has been said about the tactical which is actually understood by all levels. Nowing how to connect and recognising others most predictable moves. Much has been said about the luck aspect, grudgingly spoken with ill will and paranoia. But I think we can all agree that the randomness is not out to get anyone and that just like life, it isn't truly random. I believe it has been stated that there is a code or frequency that if a person were to crack into, even if it were completly intution, this is very much like a real life spiritual connection. But my interest is in the dynamics of group communication and how they affect the game. I am a relativly new player who has had the fortunate experience of playing well enough to see both the lowest level playing and the best of the best. I can safely say that there are tremendous differences in the social atmosphere of the levels. Players at the 10 tables do not communicate. They are out for themselves and fight in a more tribalistic, local pattern. What upper level players would call random attacks or suicide or meltdowns happen more frequently here as less interest in the game causes players to lose patience quickly or make far riskier moves. The 200 table level is where the players begin to recognize previous players and social bonds are formed. also players become more invested in the game and their standings. Now that random attacks are fewer meaning there is more awareness to others around them. Cooperation happens more frequently. Players are willing to take second or third instead of just playing for domination. But at this level many are more willing to leave a game if they are doing poorly. Now the 1 k games are very different. These players have been playing eachother for several months now. Unspoken bonds that have been created are around but very difficult to see. Chatting is almost nessisary as deals are made in seconds that will end in another few turns. Players are far more interested in keeping thier points though. So the liminal point where friendship meets self preservation becomes quite frustrating. Ok that all for now . please leave soom good thoughts. and remember... Fuck you muthafuka |
|
kwizatz wrote
at 2:11 AM, Thursday October 25, 2007 EDT hah wish. hah les.
|
|
El Destructor wrote
at 2:12 AM, Thursday October 25, 2007 EDT THE ANSWER TO YOUR POST AIDEN: GET SOME FUCKING FRIENDS
|
|
--/*Superb1*\-- wrote
at 6:10 AM, Thursday October 25, 2007 EDT lol, this post made me laugh. Qualities of a good player : 15% luck, 50% of Skills, 30% good socialising and 5% of random other things. Found it on 1 players prof. Kinda sums it.
|
|
§ilverfox wrote
at 10:49 AM, Thursday October 25, 2007 EDT lesplaydices,
I almost always qualify my statements. *grin* I did say the "vast majority". And I stand by that. El Destructor, Aiden DOES have friends. I've seen her play at the higher table. She smoozes with the best of them and gets great results for doing it. |
|
Dora Exploradora wrote
at 11:07 AM, Thursday October 25, 2007 EDT kdice good player attributes:
60% socializing 25% strategy + tactics 15% having time to spend 0% luck Luck is random! not a player attribute. ;-) |
|
kdicefreak wrote
at 11:26 AM, Thursday October 25, 2007 EDT kdice good player attributes:
-no PGA -no porn avatar -no racist, offensive comments -no proxy cheat -no point farm -no leaving 400+ stupid, meaningless comments on people's profile -no calling others' posting stupid -no spamming others' profile -you have real friends and have a life and have a job |
|
CoMik wrote
at 11:34 AM, Thursday October 25, 2007 EDT "-no leaving 400+ stupid, meaningless comments on people's profile " "-no calling others' posting stupid " I think you broke a rule. -comik- |
|
kdicefreak wrote
at 12:22 PM, Thursday October 25, 2007 EDT i am trying to be bad so that i can join the elite top 50......
|
|
Aiden wrote
at 12:23 PM, Thursday October 25, 2007 EDT thanks for the response mr.Fox. I think it ws less of a slander by el destructor and more of a critique as I smooze quite nicely with him. In fact, I call him "my Conquistador" which has saved my ass several times, as youhave pointed out.
I think this is a good example of my initial point. |
|
§ilverfox wrote
at 6:47 PM, Thursday October 25, 2007 EDT Anytime Aiden. :)
|