U KING U's turn
wishbone defended 8v8: 22 to 30 (1,2,2,6,1,2,3,5 to 5,2,4,4,3,4,6,2)
wishbone defended 8v8: 29 to 29 (3,2,6,1,4,5,5,3 to 2,1,1,6,6,6,4,3)
wishbone defended 8v8: 19 to 27 (5,1,2,2,1,2,3,3 to 3,1,6,2,4,4,2,5)
wishbone defended 8v8: 27 to 29 (4,3,5,4,5,1,1,4 to 1,2,1,4,5,5,5,6)
wishbone defeated 8v8: 31 to 26 (2,2,4,5,6,4,4,4 to 6,3,4,2,1,4,3,3)
wishbone defended 7v8: 21 to 36 (5,1,2,2,3,3,5 to 6,2,2,6,3,6,5,6)
wishbone defeated 8v8: 28 to 19 (6,3,4,5,3,1,1,5 to 2,1,2,2,2,1,5,4)
wishbone defeated 7v8: 35 to 29 (5,6,6,1,5,6,6 to 5,3,3,5,5,4,1,3)
wishbone defended 6v8: 17 to 31 (3,2,1,4,4,3 to 4,6,1,4,6,4,4,2)
U KING U finishes 2nd in round 21.
Rank: 8th Score: +420 to 1622â—†.
(+308 for 2nd and +112 for dominance)
U KING U stands up

wishbone's turn
wishbone finishes 1st in round 21.
Rank: 5th Score: +840 to 2013â—†.
(+535 for 1st and +305 for dominance)
wishbone stands up

integral's turn
MadHat_Sam defended 8v8: 32 to 34 (6,6,4,5,1,2,6,2 to 6,3,6,6,2,3,3,5)
MadHat_Sam defended 8v8: 26 to 35 (5,3,3,4,1,1,4,5 to 6,4,5,2,5,5,4,4)
MadHat_Sam defended 8v8: 22 to 35 (2,1,6,1,5,1,2,4 to 3,3,6,2,6,6,6,3)
MadHat_Sam defended 8v8: 28 to 31 (2,6,4,1,5,6,1,3 to 5,3,4,1,3,4,6,5)
MadHat_Sam defended 8v8: 22 to 31 (5,3,4,2,3,1,2,2 to 4,4,5,4,5,1,6,2)
MadHat_Sam defended 8v8: 30 to 35 (2,4,3,3,6,2,6,4 to 3,5,6,1,5,3,6,6)
neutral defended 6v7: 26 to 38 (5,4,4,5,4,4 to 6,6,6,4,4,6,6)
neutral defended 2v7: 5 to 21 (4,1 to 3,2,1,5,4,2,4)
integral finishes 2nd in round 10.

montecarlo's turn
Shevar defended 8v8: 19 to 27 (3,1,4,1,4,1,1,4 to 3,5,3,4,3,6,2,1)
Shevar defended 8v8: 28 to 30 (5,5,3,4,5,1,3,2 to 5,6,3,1,6,2,1,6)
Shevar defended 8v8: 27 to 32 (5,3,1,2,6,3,4,3 to 2,6,6,5,3,2,2,6)
Shevar defended 8v8: 29 to 31 (3,5,6,3,4,1,1,6 to 2,6,4,6,6,4,1,2)

if you attack and lose 2, 3 times in a row.. stop or you will lose very attack after that.... kdice programming gottaq love it.

Phoenix37's turn
hatty defended 8v8: 20 to 21 (5,2,3,1,2,4,2,1 to 2,1,4,2,6,1,4,1)
hatty defended 8v8: 29 to 32 (6,3,1,4,3,2,6,4 to 3,6,3,4,2,5,6,3)
hatty defeated 8v8: 29 to 27 (3,5,4,6,4,1,4,2 to 2,4,5,5,1,3,4,3)
hatty defended 8v8: 25 to 30 (5,2,1,2,2,3,6,4 to 4,4,6,4,2,4,2,4)
hatty defended 7v8: 20 to 21 (2,2,5,4,3,2,2 to 1,2,1,4,3,4,1,5)
hatty defended 8v8: 23 to 29 (3,3,3,3,2,2,1,6 to 5,1,5,4,4,3,4,3)
hatty defended 8v8: 27 to 29 (5,1,5,5,4,1,5,1 to 6,2,6,1,6,4,1,3)
hatty defended 8v8: 24 to 39 (1,1,4,1,6,5,3,3 to 5,5,2,6,6,4,6,5)

Our natural intuition is that when we chose randomly series of 0 and 1 these numbers should appear more or less interchangeably - like 01001011101010101010 etc.

But surprisingly in random series quite long sub-series of the same numbers are quite common.

This is even the method of quick distinguishing random from non-random sequences in statistics.

Adding to this that losing 8:8 is a little more probable than winning, we should not be surprised by a quite long series of lost 8:8's.

So relax and accept it as a part of the brutal reality.....

Reality, logic, and school are for losers.

montecarlo's turn
BennBenn defended 8v8: 28 to 30 (5,4,3,3,1,3,3,6 to 6,3,4,5,1,5,2,4)
BennBenn defended 8v8: 20 to 33 (3,2,1,5,2,1,1,5 to 6,5,4,5,1,6,3,3)
BennBenn defended 8v8: 31 to 37 (6,3,5,6,1,5,2,3 to 6,6,4,5,1,6,3,6)
BennBenn defended 8v8: 21 to 21 (2,4,4,4,3,2,1,1 to 3,1,1,5,1,1,3,6)
BennBenn defeated 8v8: 35 to 22 (5,5,6,4,1,6,2,6 to 6,2,1,1,1,3,6,2)

Mona 80's turn
BennBenn defended 8v8: 30 to 31 (2,4,1,6,6,3,4,4 to 3,6,1,6,3,5,6,1)
BennBenn defeated 8v8: 28 to 18 (6,6,1,3,2,6,3,1 to 1,3,2,1,1,3,5,2)
BennBenn defended 8v8: 30 to 40 (6,4,4,2,5,4,3,2 to 6,6,5,5,6,6,4,2)
BennBenn defended 8v8: 29 to 32 (4,6,4,2,4,3,2,4 to 3,4,5,3,4,5,4,4)
BennBenn defended 8v8: 26 to 36 (1,5,5,4,2,4,3,2 to 4,5,6,6,6,4,4,1)

i am interested in your product and/or service