Forum
Why does everyone lose to smaller stacks recently?
|
Fishermang wrote
at 4:31 AM, Wednesday August 22, 2007 EDT
I mean 6 losing against 4, 5 against 3, etc. This happens much more frequently than half a week ago. I lost nearly 200 points the other day because of this. The "rules" changed? It seems to me the game has become more chance based, which makes strategy a little bit less useful, and hence the game becomes more boring. Or has nothing changed, and I am imagining things? :S
|
« First
‹ Previous
Replies 11 - 15 of 15
|
Sandermatt wrote
at 4:20 AM, Saturday August 25, 2007 EDT Chance to roll an 48 is 1:1679616.
|
|
go_die_big_city wrote
at 6:43 AM, Saturday August 25, 2007 EDT A 48 is no more "statistcally" interesting than any other one
|
|
shiffy wrote
at 10:45 AM, Saturday August 25, 2007 EDT yeah joffrey i dont think you "get" numbers
|
|
Cambria wrote
at 2:53 PM, Saturday August 25, 2007 EDT i dont have proof, but i have rolled a 9 with an 8 before.
|
|
TDD wrote
at 10:33 PM, Saturday August 25, 2007 EDT A 48 is statistically interesting because it requires all dice to do only one thing. A 47 is pretty intresting as well but it is not as statistically difficult: 5,6,6,6,6,6,6,6 or 6,5,6,6,6,6,6,6 or 6,6,5,6,6,6,6,6 - there are more ways to achieve a 47 than to score a 48. Still hard, but less than a 48, or an 8 for that matter.
|
