You should have attacked 4th and 3rd first, for being weak and flagging. Then you should have attacked 2nd, but only until he had one stack. Then you should have toyed with him, always keeping him at one spot, until he flagged.

By employing these fiendly tactics, you can ensure good relations that will last not just for one game, but for your entire kdice career. Such teamwork is the foundation of a healthy and blossoming network pre-game truce players to choose from.

Now there is another alternative, that while won't lead to short term gains, may lead to long term results. You could have chosen to PUKED (passionate unnecessary kdice enviromentally-sound death). According to historians, this style of kdice allows you to maintain dignity while ensuring your best chance at success both inside the kdice ring and outside in the so-called real world. What you do is nothing. Just like Seinfeld. Instead it's not a show about nothing, it becomes a game about nothing. You just keep sitting there while your truce partner gobbles up 3rd and 4th (which honestly needs to happen to rid the world of that lowly scum). Then once he/she has done that, an interesting condumdrum will occur. What does 2nd do? In science we call that a time chasing paradox. In the past, Sinth and FemmeFatale have chosen to take the high road via a self-imploading attack attack. What's an attack attack you ask? It's when you hit "end turn" repeatedly and continuously until your browser explodes.

Personally I would have chosen to attack everyone.

Dude, your quest (or is it thirst?) for fairness and benevolence has inspired me to form a new team - the Justice League of Kdice! Probably the first mission of the JLK will be to stop the evil Soda Pop Gang. Those thugs have been promoting the anti-green, anti-environment power company PG&E! For those of you not from California (or US, we are after all in a global universe), PG&E is the Dictator of Power.

The Soda Pop Gang (herever to be referred to the gang whose name can not be said), if you are not familiar with them, are led by a Linux Penguin. This penguin jumped ship from the RedHat Gang after a power struggle with their minister of defence Suse. Unfortunately (and fortunately for us) problems have ensued at " " as Sinth (former admin assistant to James T Kirk) has joined their ranks and started a power struggle there.

You can find more about the Soda Pop Gang and their endorsement of PG&G here: http://aplayr.com/kdice/kdice/forum/topics/join%20the%20sodapop%20gang/

For the sake of the world, please join the JLK! To join, add a comment to my profile with the following information:

Name:
Another name you like:
Mothers maiden name:
Online banking user id:
Password you use for all your online banking:

A 500 word essay on what membership to the JLK would mean to you:

Thanks, and tenspeed!

The player who was in 4th should have flagged 4th. If there were only 4 people left and the bottom two flagged, there would only be two people left.

I look at it this way...if I truce with another player, to me it says that we are attempting to get 1st and 2nd together. If at the end we are first and 2nd, I do not flag 2nd if I am in second, and I dont expect him to flag if he is in second (unless there are overwhelming odds, like 20 territories to 5). Then we fight to see who gets first.

The example you set forth is slightly different than what I gave an answer for. With 2 flagged players still in, it is harder to give an answer. Someone could just flag 2nd to end it, however, as I said before, I prefer fighing to see who can get first. In this case, the fight could continue to where now one of the truce partners is lower than 3rd (or 4th) and can not even flag 2nd anymore.

Therefore, it seems reasonable to take out the flagged players. The fairest way would be to take out the 4th flagged player first, therefore not ruining their position. But that might not be possible.

As I was typing this, something started to not make sense. If the 2 others were flagged 3rd and 4th, they would have been out of the game, so I assume they were both flagged 3rd. Therefore, it is on them to either have one accept reflagging to 4th, or accept getting attacked. In your example, you said you expected your truce partner to flag 2nd and "that would be it". Doesnt sound that would have been it, there would still have been 2 players flagged for 3rd. So someone needed to attack someone. Or reflag 4th. Either way, you and your truce partner could still fight for 1st and 2nd.

So it doesnt sound like your partner did anything wrong to me, nor did you. If he thought his best avenue to get first was to attack a flagged player, then so be it. As you know, 2 3rd place flags do not work, one has to go by some means. And if you thought your best way to get first was to force your partner to flag 2nd, then that sounds correct to me as well.

The difference in your example here and my overall view of a truce resulting in 1st and 2nd place is that there must have been 2 3rd place flags. If that was the case, only two things could happen. Either let those two fight for 3rd, then they will be eventually be gone and you can now fight for first, or is that isnt reasonable (for example, one 3rd place is in between you and your partner and the other is located behind either you or your partner) then someone must make some type of decision.

If there were four players and one flagged fourth he would immediately be removed from the game. Then when one guy flagged third HE would be removed. The situation you describe is impossible.

If you truce you should NOT be accepting flags from people outside your alliance. You broke the truce simply by accepting those flags and then compounded your dishonourable behaviour by attacking your ally.

Terrible.

who gives a fuck?!?! flip a coin or something who cares. do what you want. smoke weed. fuck bitches. get money
-greekboi