kristel, IMHO, I love the top tables. I'm trying to do the best I can, since this is the only game I'm good at(or become accustomed to). Soo, even though, yes, 1700 tables are not as flaggy, They are a sonofabitch sometimes to play in.

Aixo once said he was sick of the damn constant cutting involved in playing there. It's horrific to play end expect anything, so, I don't like them for that reason. Also, 1900/2000 + players actually know what the hell to do.
I say this since, like all strategy games I play, I get deep satisfaction out of kicking others asses and dominating over all.As a result, some freaktard with a 1760 cutting up my ass cuz he truced and won three or four games in a row (probably more for that score) gets my panties in a bunch (figuratively, not literally. I wear panties for things better than kdice ;) jk)

But, really, If I don't get no satisfaction, then I ain't not gonna be no happy. As for the real topic, if more 1900's played at the 1700 table, then, yeah, things might work themselves out. But something is telling me that this issue has a bit to do with who plays when and where. (Don't get me wrong, I'm not playing in another 1700 tables as long as I can help it).

I'm curious.... how many 1900 players are even left now? Seems like there's almost nobody between 1900 and 2000 because of the table gap.

udbking, it doesnt have to be that they are left.

Its quite natural in average they get their score dragged down to 1700-1900 ...