Forum
gap is too big and im sad...(to ryan, please read)...
|
sarahxxx wrote
at 10:55 AM, Tuesday May 8, 2007 EDT
i have recently dropped below 2000 (and gutted) and the 1900 tables seem to come and go...cant there be permanent 1900 AND 2000 tables?
one loss at a 1700 table for me would mean me losing like a million points,,,i dont want that cos i know i can cut it at the top as i have done now for several weeks...i know other players are in similar positions...please sort it saz x |
|
JKD wrote
at 12:26 PM, Tuesday May 8, 2007 EDT There's a gap between the top 100 and top 1000 tables? o_O
((or whatever the actual numbers are)) |
|
montecarlo wrote
at 3:40 PM, Tuesday May 8, 2007 EDT sarah, lets be real. you wont lose a million points. it'll be more like 1.2 million. i did that in my head with skrum's tapl/qooa calculator, and i stand by it.
|
|
aixo wrote
at 4:48 PM, Tuesday May 8, 2007 EDT oh people... stop complaining, PLZ!
wtf??? if the "gap" between 1700 and 2000-tables is to big, it will reconfig by itself soon! The 2000-tables are there, ´cause there are more then 250 players with a better elo then 2000. If to many players fall under this mark, and not enough players are able to climb up, the mark will fall again to 1900. So easy. And if there are 1000 players above 1800, the gap will be shorter then, so that we may expect stable 2000-tables... What´s so hard to understand to this function??? |
|
algios wrote
at 1:19 PM, Wednesday May 9, 2007 EDT I agree with aixo, at the same tie I want to complain about another thing: There is nostability about 1900/2000 tables, because it depends on one person that tables are switching. I heard and experience myself a little discomfort at that point because as a player above 1900 one can't say, i don't need to look if there is a table for my rank. It sometimes changes within minutes. I guess soe corridor of +-5 would do a great job. Nonetheless I am happy to play again.
|
|
redsox5445 wrote
at 2:05 PM, Wednesday May 9, 2007 EDT |
|
Tech wrote
at 2:50 PM, Wednesday May 9, 2007 EDT Sawah iz sad. ;_; *cries*
Meh. Deal with it, seriously. P.S. Now that was patronizing. |
|
|
sarahxxx wrote
at 4:35 AM, Thursday May 10, 2007 EDT tech man, u such a funny guy! but seriously, u sit there with a wank rating of 15...whatever played hardle any games this month of the past 3 for that matter and slate me. u may have been good at one point many months and u been around longer than me...thats fair enough but ur a 'has been'.
come find me on the tables, then we can sort this out...until then... |
|
|
sarahxxx wrote
at 4:38 AM, Thursday May 10, 2007 EDT and also, this was a light hearted suggestion i put to ryan...positive feed back from anyone is much apreciated to voice thier opinions (the point of a forum) but u just being personal towrds me...and dare i say it?... a complete twat!
|
|
Spartan300 wrote
at 4:47 AM, Thursday May 10, 2007 EDT Sarah you are one of the only people I have ever see challenge someone to a game of kdice. It is a game of chance.....
|
|
|
sarahxxx wrote
at 4:57 AM, Thursday May 10, 2007 EDT lol...ok
so u explain to me how the same players are among the top 25 month after month after month...u continuously lucky...NO! there is a lot of luck involved yes...but there is alot of skill/strategy involved too! |
