Forum
Title
|
@TrojjanT wrote
at 2:34 PM, Monday February 20, 2012 EST
@TrojjanT's turn
Bobuck12.34 defeated 8v8, 31 to 20, (1,2,6,6,6,3,4,3 to 5,1,2,4,1,4,2,1) Bobuck12.34 defeated 7v8, 28 to 27, (2,3,4,6,1,6,6 to 4,3,6,2,3,4,4,1) Bobuck12.34 defeated 6v8, 30 to 27, (6,5,4,5,4,6 to 1,4,5,6,2,3,2,4) Bobuck12.34 defeated 8v8, 29 to 24, (5,5,3,6,2,3,4,1 to 5,1,6,2,2,5,1,2) Bobuck12.34 defeated 7v8, 34 to 30, (6,5,6,5,5,1,6 to 3,2,3,3,6,2,5,6) Bobuck12.34 defended 6v6, 24 to 26, (2,3,4,6,3,6 to 4,1,4,6,6,5) Bobuck12.34 defended 8v6, 23 to 27, (2,3,2,3,4,6,2,1 to 5,4,5,6,2,5) Bobuck12.34 defeated 8v6, 23 to 19, (5,1,3,4,5,3,1,1 to 2,4,4,4,1,4) |
Replies 1 - 3 of 3
|
Gurgi wrote
at 11:43 PM, Monday February 20, 2012 EST wasn't an interesting enough title. didn't bother reading rest
|
|
Blumiere wrote
at 12:56 AM, Tuesday February 21, 2012 EST The only thing remotely impressive about this is the 6v8, but then again I've seen a successful 4v8 so even that's ruined for me.
|
|
KDICEMOD wrote
at 8:44 AM, Tuesday February 21, 2012 EST The first 5 rolls are nice: 8v8, 7v8, 6v8, 8v8, 7v8. But then you lost and 8v6 two rolls later. Luck somewhat corrected itself and I'm sure by Ryan's calculations you had no more than 53 or 54% luck for that turn.
I hope this at least earned you a 1hit on Bobuck... |