most of what deadcode says is factually based. he seems to control his personal opinions and keep them out of his fact/statistic based reasoning as much as anyone else on the forum. I think maybe sam/jpc do this as well as him.

i wouldn't say factually based.

veta, deads facts for the most part do not come from wikipedia, so we can safely call them facts.

he is unrelentingly consistent. i will give him that.

I was more referring to his claims regarding our current historical low in corporate taxes. Anyone capable of using google can see that corporate taxes are at historical lows not highs.

I also find it amusing that people that disagree with me try to attack the credibility of my sources (congressional budget office, Wikipedia, etc) rather than my argument. I assume it's because when you can't argue with facts you can only argue facts.

im barley call edge edge you kate ed, but what the fuck does this mean?

I assume it's because when you can't argue with facts you can only argue facts.

what in the fuck did greekboi just try to say....

i see no response from the person addressed in the title, to everyone else who responded thank you, but your jacking my thread gtfo.