Some people just want to play, and at stages only 0 tables are available.

Hello CaptainLager,

we had this discussion before. That time it was "why play 500 when you got 3k". Some just take the first available seat they may sit, some don't like the "risk" at higher tables, some are full of the politics and strategy...

Who cares? If they enjoy, where's the damage?

Louis, I am very much not who you think I am.

Nothing wrong with the occasional game on the 100s if you have three-digit points, but that's not what's going on this month. Very sockpuppety, lots of dudes who should be on 500 tables teaming up on non-allied players who are just starting. It is a little distasteful.

Well - I did not think you are CL, I just hoped it would crawl out of its hole...

OK, IF the "big" guys team up at low tables, that sucks. We can agree on that as it seems that we can agree on playing lower tables for fun in a fair game as it seems.

Too bad, end of discussion.

Wait has this changed from playing 0tables to playing 100tables?

no, just my stupid fingers typing 100 when I mean 0. I mean 0.

Considering the fact that if you sit a 100 and get 7th ur back to the zeros...It's at all lame play by a player with 150 points to sit a 0 table. 0 table limits are about the only ones on the site that are realistic.

You overshot your mark here alt.

It's at all = It's not at all

Isn't it all cool if you only look and don't touch? >.>

...anyway, table limits are there for a reason. As long as you're any good, you are forced to move to university and, eventually, to the old boys' club.

^-1 extreme over generalization of the game.