Forum
What gives?!?
|
@EricInTheCloud wrote
at 9:30 PM, Monday August 22, 2011 EDT
Matthew Milano defeated 9v7, 37 to 28, (6,4,3,6,4,2,3,3,6 to 6,3,2,5,2,4,6)
|
Replies 1 - 9 of 9
|
@EricInTheCloud wrote
at 9:35 PM, Monday August 22, 2011 EDT 16 stacks? +64 dice? Why make this change midmonth??
|
|
superxchloe wrote
at 9:47 PM, Monday August 22, 2011 EDT why bitch about a positive change to the game? Did you not notice that there's a whole freakin column in the "change table" dialogue for what stacks each table is?
|
|
TheBetterYodel wrote
at 11:03 PM, Monday August 22, 2011 EDT I think it could be argued that this change is not positive.
+ I think this guy doesn't play much...No need to jump on him. |
|
superxchloe wrote
at 11:15 PM, Monday August 22, 2011 EDT the change certainly isn't negative. this guy plays more than I do. I replied to him with the same amount of incredulity he used.
|
|
miguel30 wrote
at 12:46 AM, Tuesday August 23, 2011 EDT remember when we were all clamoring for 4 stack and 16 stack games? lol nevermind.
inb4sum1saysbgr8fulwegotsumthingnewatall |
|
Skyler wrote
at 2:12 AM, Tuesday August 23, 2011 EDT Positive or negative.. Fortunately you can still choose what to play.
Avoid 4 or 16 stack games and problem is solved |
|
@EricInTheCloud wrote
at 8:24 AM, Tuesday August 23, 2011 EDT superxchloe, I think you've got me confused with someone else. But you're right. I had not noticed the new column until you mentioned it.
|
|
superxchloe wrote
at 11:04 AM, Tuesday August 23, 2011 EDT I didn't. You play more than I do.
|
|
Kehoe wrote
at 11:32 AM, Tuesday August 23, 2011 EDT What Skyler means is, avoid 8 and 16 stack games and play 4 stack games solely.. They're the best.
|