Forum
Test
|
Mike Williams wrote
at 9:10 AM, Sunday August 14, 2011 EDT
Test
|
Replies 1 - 6 of 6
|
jurgen wrote
at 4:42 PM, Monday August 15, 2011 EDT since this was a "test" , might as well use it too:
odds(%)_2 Att_3 Att__4 Att__5 Att__6 Att__7 Att__8 Att__9 Att__10 Att_11 Att_12 Att_13 Att_14 Att_15 Att_16 Att 1Def____83,8__97,3__99,73_99,98_100___100___100___100___100___100____100____100___100____100____100 2Def____44,37_77,85_93,92_98,79_99,82_99,98_100___100___100___100____100____100___100____100____100 3Def____15,2__45,36_74,28_90,93_97,53_99,47_99,91_99,99_100____100____100____100___100____100____100 4Def____3,59__19,17_45,95_71,81_88,4__96,15_98,95_99,76_99,95__99,99__100____100____100____100____100 5Def____0,61__6,07__22,04_46,37_69,96_86,24_94,77_98,33_99,55__99,89__99,98__100____100____100____100 6Def____0,08__1,49__8,34__24,24_46,67_68,52_84,39_93,44_97,64__99,26__99,8___99,95__99,99__100____100 7Def____0,01__0,29__2,54__10,36_26____46,91_67,35_82,78_92,17__96,91__98,93__99,67__99,91__99,98__100 8Def____0_____0,05__0,64__3,67__12,15_27,44_47,11_66,37_81,38__90,98__96,16__98,55__99,51__99,85__99,96 9Def____0_____0,01__0,13__1,1___4,81__13,74_28,65_47,27_65,55__80,14__89,87__95,41__98,14__99,32__99,78 10Def___0_____0_____0,02__0,28__1,63__5,93__15,15_29,68_47,41__64,83__79,03__88,83__94,66__97,7___99,11 11Def___0_____0_____0_____0,06__0,48__2,23__7,01__16,42_30,58__47,53__64,21__78,03__87,85__93,93__97,25 12Def___0_____0_____0_____0,01__0,12__0,73__2,85__8,03__17,57__31,36__47,63__63,66__77,13__86,94__93,22 13Def___0_____0_____0_____0_____0,03__0,21__1,03__3,49__9,01___18,6___32,06__47,72__63,17__76,31__86,09 14Def___0_____0_____0_____0_____0,01__0,06__0,33__1,36__4,14___9,94___19,55__32,69__47,81__62,73__75,56 15Def___0_____0_____0_____0_____0_____0,01__0,1___0,48__1,72___4,79___10,81__20,42__33,25__47,88__62,33 16Def___0_____0_____0_____0_____0_____0_____0,03__0,15__0,64___2,1____5,44___11,64__21,22__33,77__47,95 |
|
jurgen wrote
at 4:42 PM, Monday August 15, 2011 EDT close enough for this forum
|
|
Louis Cypher wrote
at 6:35 AM, Tuesday August 16, 2011 EDT LOOOL, perfect comment Jurgen :-)
|
|
Louis Cypher wrote
at 6:37 AM, Tuesday August 16, 2011 EDT For the 0% probability - how about instancing something like the lucky punch? In some phantasy roll playing if you roll 100 you do critical damage or kill any oponent about instantly.... So, if we have 16v1 fight, in the back a 100-sided dice is rolled and if that one wins, the number of lost dice for 16-stack is determined by rolling a 15-sided dice....
|
|
Louis Cypher wrote
at 6:38 AM, Tuesday August 16, 2011 EDT That would give AWESOME causes for cursing and make this game even less strategic than it is (if that's possible).
|
|
Louis Cypher wrote
at 6:38 AM, Tuesday August 16, 2011 EDT Oh yes, in a test-threat I can test stupid ideas as well.
|