rounn one:
4v3 fail
4v2 fail
deaded

Crazy Smurf's turn
Bartez defeated 4v4, 17 to 10, (6,6,3,2 to 2,1,4,3)
Bartez defeated 4v4, 14 to 8, (6,2,1,5 to 2,3,1,2)
Bartez defeated 4v4, 17 to 9, (4,4,5,4 to 2,1,4,2)
Bartez defeated 3v4, 10 to 8, (3,4,3 to 1,3,2,2)
Bartez defeated 3v4, 12 to 8, (3,4,5 to 1,2,1,4)
Bartez defeated 3v3, 11 to 8, (3,6,2 to 1,4,3)
Bartez defended 2v4, 10 to 11, (4,6 to 1,1,6,3)
Bartez defended 2v4, 5 to 10, (3,2 to 5,1,1,3)
Bartez defended 2v4, 8 to 13, (6,2 to 5,4,1,3)
+31 dice

+31 dice, I think the 4 max should have a lower reserve limit

you can attack like 11 times and stay stacked next round

10 jurgs :) depending on his reserves ofc.
4stacks it's hard to suicide out.

I know you only need 3 each for each 4v4 but he has 31 connected lands so he probably has way more than just these +31 to use next round so it will be 14? 15? idc tbh

so neither 10 or 11 are accurate, that's why I said "like 11" , to give the idea that you practically can't get unstacked in such an endgame situation

:)

I had 13 unsuccessful attacks in a row in a game. That was not amusing. Lost to kakku there... and thanks to stupid 1/3 crap I never agreed to I got 3rd behind a player that flagged me earlier and that I didn't eat for that reason (thus being small in endgame).

my advice :

* change IP
* change account
* clearly refuse to do the 1 3 if you don't want it, if 2nd really wants to impose it, flag the other guy when needed and get 2nd at all cost

the new stack game feature needs a little adjustments

- restack reduce (4s - 14/15) increase (16s-55/60) idk just suggestions :)

- one stack type game for each table (going trough forums every time is a little anoying)

- kinda hard sometimes to see the stacks in the 16 stack games, maybe adjust the color to make it easier to see

reducing too much from 4 stacks tables will increase the vflags imo

yeah I already made some suggestions about changes in dice reserves and visibility of the 16 stacks

all feedback is welcome