Forum
Reviving jurg's alltime medal count? and other stats you want to see?
|
superxchloe wrote
at 11:56 AM, Thursday December 2, 2010 EST
anyone want to? His formula was:
10X gold + 7X silver + 5X bronze + 3X top25 + #top100 I'll combine mains with alts unless someone starts claiming to be someone they obviously aren't (ie any of you boys pretending to be loob). If there's another stat anyone wants that seems feasibly calculable I'll try to figure it out over winter break. |
|
Mister_T wrote
at 12:09 PM, Thursday December 2, 2010 EST Nice of you to offer chloe, but I think i got this on my own.. Let me see... Hmmmm.. 1 :) (Too lazy to check my other account)
|
|
the full monte wrote
at 12:14 PM, Thursday December 2, 2010 EST change the formula. that is an insanely oversimplified step function. make it a continuous function, like x^-0.5 or something (i.e. 1st is 1 pt, 4th is 0.5 pt, 16th is 0.25 pts).
yes goddammit im biased, because i have 4 4ths and 4 5ths, and those are equal to 8 25ths under jurg's step function. i vote we dont play down to Ryans trophy colors, but actually use a meaningful continuous function. sorta like how asr>tazd. |
|
superxchloe wrote
at 12:23 PM, Thursday December 2, 2010 EST That makes sense monte. I could just do 101-place for points though (-> 100 for first, 1 for 100th). A 16th shouldn't be worth only 2.5x 100th. I'll play with the numbers (and read other suggestions) after I finish my comm paper.
|
|
jurgen wrote
at 12:45 PM, Thursday December 2, 2010 EST whoa, yeah, let's get that medal count from under the dust, been too lazy to redo it but I am sure my "secretary from my own thread" will do a much better job than me
I am very much in favor of the fuction modification, only if I had know that in the past I should not have stopped playing so often when my blue was safe :P |
|
jurgen wrote
at 12:56 PM, Thursday December 2, 2010 EST oh and I almost forgot,I stopped doing those medal counts because it was a lot of work (with the alts) but mainly because Shevar didn't give me the + he promised me once for doing it
looking back all these months later, maybe he was too high at that time to remember :P |
|
Fatman_x wrote
at 1:54 PM, Thursday December 2, 2010 EST so do it that way chloe 100 pts for firs one point for 100th, that will be more accurate :)
|
|
the full monte wrote
at 2:10 PM, Thursday December 2, 2010 EST i dont like chloes linear scale. that means that two 50ths equals one 1st. imho it should be exponential somehow. i still like ^-0.5
1 1st = 2 4ths = 4 16ths = 10 100ths seems about right. |
|
Kdice_CPR wrote
at 2:30 PM, Thursday December 2, 2010 EST im pretty sure this is a stat I will win. :D
|
|
jurgen wrote
at 2:40 PM, Thursday December 2, 2010 EST __1__10
__2__7,1 __3__5,8 __4__5 __5__4,5 __6__4,1 __7__3,8 __8__3,5 __9__3,3 _10__3,2 _12__2,9 _14__2,7 _16__2,5 _18__2,4 _20__2,2 _22__2,1 _25__2 _30__1,8 _35__1,7 _40__1,6 _45__1,5 _50__1,4 _55__1,3 _60__1,3 _65__1,2 _70__1,2 _80__1,1 _90__1,1 100__1 values for 10*(position)^-0,5 |
|
jurgen wrote
at 2:48 PM, Thursday December 2, 2010 EST I got all the basic info still in a spreadsheet although I only retrieved the top3, blue , white info from it before.
I think I found a way and might try in the weekend but I wonder if excel will be able to handle that many formula's for like 1000 accounts at once |