Forum
stormbot
|
greekboi wrote
at 3:40 PM, Friday January 22, 2010 EST
please calculate this:
greekboi's turn xXxJozefxXx defended 8v6, 23 to 29, (4,1,2,1,1,6,5,3 to 4,6,5,3,5,6) xXxJozefxXx defended 8v6, 19 to 19, (1,2,4,2,1,6,1,2 to 3,6,2,1,2,5) xXxJozefxXx defended 7v6, 20 to 20, (4,4,5,1,1,3,2 to 3,4,2,2,3,6) |
Replies 1 - 10 of 10
|
montecarlo wrote
at 3:46 PM, Friday January 22, 2010 EST 50/50. either it happened or it didnt.
(any other 2p2ers out there?) |
|
|
greekboi wrote
at 4:20 PM, Friday January 22, 2010 EST monte can u teach me those maths?
p.s. i love you |
|
detenmile wrote
at 10:13 PM, Friday January 22, 2010 EST monte you have no clue how happy that statement made me.
|
|
kokobongo wrote
at 3:11 AM, Saturday January 23, 2010 EST 8v6 = 84.4% success
7v6 = 68.5% success 0.844 x 0.844 x 0.685 = 0.488 all to succeed is 48%, so the chance all to fail should be 52%, quite probable, not like few days ago when i was 2v5 |
|
Shevar wrote
at 4:33 AM, Saturday January 23, 2010 EST you realize how dumb that statement is, koko?
the opposite even of all rolls succeeding is not all failing. you calculated the probability of at least 1 failing. correct forumula is: (1-0.844)*(1-0.844)*(1-0.685)=0.124 |
|
|
Shevar wrote
at 4:33 AM, Saturday January 23, 2010 EST event*
|
|
|
greekboi wrote
at 3:03 PM, Saturday January 23, 2010 EST lmao koko u are one retarded kid stop huffing glue
|
|
Mustang wrote
at 4:15 AM, Monday January 25, 2010 EST Yeah Monte, i hate this phrase.
|
|
|
montecarlo wrote
at 8:12 AM, Monday January 25, 2010 EST shev, correct math, wrong answer. that equals 0.77%, not 12.4%
|
|
|
Shevar wrote
at 8:53 AM, Monday January 25, 2010 EST yeah, must have pressed square root instead of square. but koko remains stupid.
|
