itt Fiero bitches about mods doing their job.

how is this mods doing their job?
he chooses which accounts to be offended by and which not to be offended by even if they are identical in context and he choses which accounts to -play and which to not -play even if both have the same admission of guilt. How can you possibly use reasoning of 'chatlogs and admission of pga are not enough to ban' and then say '-play for admission of pga'

srsly

Fiero:

My response to your post is as follows:

A: I didn't use a chat log, I was actually there for the chat making it more than admissible.

B: I never said admission to PGA isn't bannable, that would make no sense. But it is a judgement call as to whether someone says it in jest or truly means what they say. Thraxisgay made no mention of his/her statement being incorrect or meant in jest until after I banned the account.

C: In hind sight I shouldn't have used the "inappropriate name" reason and I will unban the account after I write this post and then reban it with only the proper reason. Thank you for bringing this hypocrisy to my attention.

Thank you for your attention to this matter fiero. Your input is appreciated.

As a point of clarification, the word is spelled C-O-R-R-U-P-T and not C-U-R-R-U-P-T.

Kind Regards,

Thrax

so why wasn't 'dasfury' / 'v.v.v'
saying publically that he pga'd all month with both accounts and should be banned reason for ban on both?

Did he/they say it in chat while I was present?

he emailed it to you and posted it on the forum

Chat logs mean nothing unless the mod is present, and fiero showed they mean nothing even if the mod is present some times.

Fiero is right here.

Easy Solution: Additional mods

nix's comment wins the thread anyways