Forum
POINT SYSTEM
|
Teo_bucuresti wrote
at 9:19 PM, Saturday March 14, 2009 EDT
I would propose ELO rankings back, but in a different way:
Players will be simply ranked by their permanent elo score only if they were active... Let's say the min rule to be 30 games in last 30 days (or minumum 60 games in last 30 days) So if one is not active he dissapears from ranks but he still keeps his elo score and if he gets active again he will be back in rankings. Starting from all over again each month is so depressive, i mean everything is gone at the begining of the month. And elo system is much better way to see who plays better than curent system. Please write what you think people, I really want to hear your comments |
Replies 1 - 1 of 1
|
skrumgaer wrote
at 11:43 AM, Sunday March 15, 2009 EDT I agree. Having a minimum number of games smooths out the luck factor. Elo works fine in chess because there is no luck factor (other than drawing black or white, and that is corrected for by alternating starting colors).
|
