Forum
Lets try something. RE: Reviews.
|
rgs258 wrote
at 11:03 PM, Wednesday February 18, 2009 EST
Straight to the point: put one of these signs at the beginning of your reviews:
+ <--great player/person; positive review = <--general comment; neutral review - <--horrible human being; negative review ...Ok, we all know how reviews are kind of a joke. But they still do tell a story. My only gripe (that I'll address here) is that it can be hard to scan somebodies 90+ reviews when I'm deciding if a truce is worth it. So, lets try to make this easier... |
Replies 1 - 5 of 5
|
rgs258 wrote
at 6:24 PM, Thursday February 19, 2009 EST its a comment, and now its at the top of the conversation list. YAY!
|
|
wiggin1 wrote
at 6:46 PM, Thursday February 19, 2009 EST Hmm, I see your general point.
Maybe there could be a box you could check for some normal grievances. Like: "Breaks truce" "Doesn't respect flags even though his position is secure." Etc. Then the page could show at the top: "breaks truce" / games played (and the other things) |
|
rgs258 wrote
at 10:32 PM, Thursday February 19, 2009 EST great idea!
...i'm thinking that this could end up like the seller rating system on amazon or ebay. |
|
rgs258 wrote
at 10:35 PM, Thursday February 19, 2009 EST ...my only fear is if stupid people start leaving neg comments from multiple accounts.
(and before that one douche calls me out on doing that: it was a mistake, and i pulled the comment that i'd left from my alt; you have my apologies for that....your still a douche) |
|
prometheus_ wrote
at 1:38 AM, Friday February 20, 2009 EST Could make it so that reviews can only be posted if you played a game with the guy.
I think the current system works pretty well though, I mean, its not *that* hard to scan a page or two. |