Forum
A week into January, moondust leads in tourney standings.
|
skrumgaer wrote
at 1:21 PM, Tuesday January 6, 2009 EST
The proxy variable for tourney winnings is draw, which is total score less earned points. Draw includes net tourney winnings plus membership bonus plus star purchases plus zero score reset. This early in the month, many of the top 100 are members who have not yet tapped their membership point reserves.
Rank Player Draw 1st moondust 14259 10th yellowfin 10452 5th Shevar 8715 3rd beyazguvercinus 8545 2nd jethr0 8056 4th Extasy 7236 78th 1.234.56775 6846 9th fandango1 6840 14th Mitsi the cat 5960 15th Baz_Eagles 5752 6th danceswithdices 5682 17th james682 5022 16th olliejjc16 4910 24th willywonka1 4700 23rd masterDD 4581 7th shadolin 4474 21st Ltrain 4474 11th smirkatroid 4217 39th fletch85 3884 25th Gdott 3702 55th Jdub! 3652 28th Lalia 3636 22nd simmersiz 3447 60th Johnson213 3444 13th fcuku 3436 42nd mr Kreuzfeld 3227 12th war dog847 3150 35th nyos 2984 19th cnkcnk 2835 66th Ghostface 2775 27th dfiend 2740 8th bsn 2730 30th kevin143 2682 62nd CyberLeader 2545 51st jbw 2525 41st rigor mortis 2505 94th Dude111 2503 63rd Valarian 2501 67th misst56 2501 93rd mikalye 2501 95th whiteknightent 2501 96th yd101 2501 44th Mitynerp 2500 47th Speed3 2500 48th Bahaduras 2500 65th OFT-RPW 2500 68th sportjunkies 2500 70th Embair 2500 71st Hails5 2500 72nd montecarlo 2500 73rd MadHat_Sam 2500 74th Thraxle 2500 75th Ryan 2500 76th jurgen 2500 77th Cloud9 2500 79th sye 2500 83rd Andrew Dice K. 2500 84th Rol 2500 86th Zete02 2500 88th Bombardier DS 65 2500 92nd DaveC 2500 98th WanderingBuddha 2500 100th tallpube 2500 49th Schotte29 2499 57th DoubleDogDareYa 2499 58th TomBrady 2499 61st aarrowgant 2499 82nd tiagosilva 2499 89th Victoray 2499 33rd Vermont 2497 85th jubi 2493 32nd Honyo 2484 59th popnorg 2445 38th eramus 2410 81st peter luftig 2400 80th Macool 2312 99th VoluptuousCloud 2292 26th MsCat 2289 90th N.Chamberlin 2255 56th mzziaz 2246 87th Revilo 2216 64th sweezle 2015 40th snoopdog 2000 97th Roll Over 1735 36th lesplaydices 1498 18th GreGGwar 1398 31st Iborra 1378 54th Reatsu 1276 29th MadWilly 598 69th REMCO_1 260 53rd Dark_lunatic_K 162 34th BAMMBI 148 50th fjortiss 38 52nd Machetto 0 91st murphyb2 -17 43rd Jitterbug -41 20th Mushu Porker -131 45th KillerQueen -146 46th generalissimus S -483 37th Jslap! -566 |
Replies 1 - 9 of 9
|
Vermont wrote
at 1:30 PM, Tuesday January 6, 2009 EST skrum, couldn't Ryan create a read-only account to the database so you could run some queries on the side? Or at least access to a backup if he's worried about a bad query ruining the system. You could run some far more interesting (and much easier for you to do!) analysis if he were interested.
|
|
moondust wrote
at 4:33 PM, Tuesday January 6, 2009 EST I think that this is already interesting enough
:D Thanks Skrum |
|
|
Vermont wrote
at 5:41 PM, Tuesday January 6, 2009 EST sorry - that wasn't meant to imply anything negative about these stats.
However, if skrum could just run a query every month it would save him a great deal of time, and let him do some more complex analysis. |
|
war dog847 wrote
at 8:42 PM, Tuesday January 6, 2009 EST hmmm, i won 4.2k on the sunday slam. i think it's the 5th but i don't recall. so i should be up there
|
|
|
skrumgaer wrote
at 10:49 PM, Tuesday January 6, 2009 EST Wardog:
You are there. |
|
Shevar wrote
at 6:12 AM, Wednesday January 7, 2009 EST nice going moon, keep it up!
and thanks skrum. its always good to see a list where i dont have to read a lot untill i find my name :) |
|
|
war dog847 wrote
at 7:14 PM, Wednesday January 7, 2009 EST ah thx, i had to recheck sorry
|
|
firefox1 wrote
at 6:03 AM, Saturday January 10, 2009 EST a bad query is not going to ruin the system if all he can do is select
|
|
|
Vermont wrote
at 12:40 PM, Saturday January 10, 2009 EST A bad query could certainly bring the system to its knees, although you are correct in that it would not corrupt the data.
Performance is a primary concern for Ryan. He said a primary reason for not using a better, fully-functioned, standard forum with features like editing, searching, consistent formatting, and rich text is that he would not have control over a potential performance problem. (I'd point you to the forum thread, but I can't exactly go search for it.) Of course, I think that's bunk since there's some incredibly well developed, completely free forum solutions out there that would be a significant improvement (and that power sites with thousands of users,) but I don't run the show here. (Pretty funny that someone using the google toolkit for his product would be against using another robust product developed by others.) |
